1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
maks197457 [2]
3 years ago
11

Which statement below has been written objectively? A. Students that experience bullying are weak. B. High school students invol

ved in bullying need attention from their parents. C. I believe that you should not participate in cyberbullying and bullying. D. The 62% of high school students that experience cyberbullying, and bullying is signaling an epidemic in schools across the US.
English
2 answers:
kupik [55]3 years ago
4 0

1. Bullies and phantoms

2. To show that cyberbullies are hard to identify

3. It shows the dangers of cyberbullying

Explanation: on edge

kherson [118]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: The statement that has been written objectively is D. The 62% of high school students that experience cyber bullying, and bullying is signaling an epidemic in schools across the U

Explanation:

You might be interested in
An opinion can not be proben without dispute
Helen [10]
It can, because some people are ignorant and can’t take some opinions so they fight that its wrong.
4 0
3 years ago
Can someone help me with my classes online?
Viefleur [7K]
Yesssss I willlllllll
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What comparison does the speaker<br> make between himself and flies?
Anna11 [10]

Answer:

where is the poem/story

if there is no context how can i answer

Explanation:

LOL

4 0
3 years ago
Which logical fallacy appears in the passage?​
statuscvo [17]

The correct answer is A. Post hoc ergo propter hoc

Explanation:

In a Post hoc ergo proper hoc fallacy the speaker considers one event is the cause of another because one event follows the other in time. This implies the speaker incorrectly assumes one event to be the cause of another without real evidence. This occurs in the example presented because the speaker thinks Jalessa being a President is the cause that the school was broken into. However, there is no evidence Jalessa is the direct cause of this event and this cannot be concluded based on the fact the incident occurred after Jalessa became the class president.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP ASAP!!!
densk [106]

Answer:

It should compare or contrast two things and provide something for you to prove.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A symbolical narrative is also known as a(n):
    7·1 answer
  • Read this excerpt from A Black Hole Is NOT a Hole.
    7·1 answer
  • Who would be a turtle who could help it?
    11·1 answer
  • Read the passage. Savage showed talent at the school and a special interest in African art. While at the school, she received wh
    9·2 answers
  • Suppose an author uses multiple narrators to tell a story about a magician who amazes a town with his performance until he is ex
    15·2 answers
  • What is the purpose of the author including formulas and graphs throughout the book, including when Christopher explains the pop
    14·1 answer
  • Is there anything wrong with this poem? If there is anything wrong, point it out please!!!!
    12·1 answer
  • Lucy is writing a research paper on the history If the
    13·1 answer
  • How does this excerpt show that esperanza has changed?​
    5·1 answer
  • Does a period go inside or outside quotation marks
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!