The improvements made traveling easier and more efficient
<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>
Potter's Historical Interpretations of the Civil War:
Students of history state that he had a lopsided scholarly history, since he offered a dimension of tolerance to the genius bondage philosophies that he doesn't grant to the abolitionist subjugation development. Abolitionists were everything from oppressive to helpful people, as per Potter.
Holt's Historical Interpretation of the Civil War:
Holt, then again, was a teacher so he given an increasingly clear translation of the Civil War, indeed, Holt sees the contention as a breakdown in America's majority rule political procedure. No longer contrasts must be settled inside the field of fight, as per him.
While there can't be a definite answer, there is an explanation. America is generally a diverse place, as it is the country of immigrants. This brings in a mixture of culture.
Certain cultures may have hate for others, which can generate the hate you see. Another possibility is the idea of the silent majority. The amount of people who spread hate may be in the minority, but their voice is so loud they may appear to be the majority. =)
<span>The correct answer to this question is that the best description of the Bill of Rights of the answers listed here is most likely B - it outlines them. Prior to the bill of rights, there was no set definition of what citizens did and did not have a right to.</span>
