Answer:
Partition of India/Indian Partition
Explanation:
After the World War II ended, the European imperial powers were in ruins, economically badly damaged, and with depleted and exhausted military forces. This meant that they are no longer able to hold onto their colonies, so they had to grant them independence. India was one of those countries that was granted independence. And while that came as a big positive, there was also a negative in it, the country was divided on religious basis into two countries, the Hindu dominated India, and the Muslim dominated Pakistan. That resulted in lot of anger, tensions, and conflicts between the two groups and countries, with millions of people being displaced, injured, or murdered. It didn't stopped there though, as after the initial partition where there was suppose to be two countries, later it turned to be three, as Bangladesh managed to become a separate country too.
The correct answer would be A. The British monarch should be respected at all times by the colonists. I know because this is the only answer that is an idea not expressed in the pamphlet Common Sense, and I also had this question on a test that I had; Also could you please mark me brainliest.
Answer:
he proceeded to narrate some of the facts in his own history as a slave, and in the course of his speech gave utterance to many noble thoughts and thrilling reflections. As soon as he had taken his seat, filled with hope and admiration, I rose, and declared that PATRICK HENRY, of revolutionary fame, never made a speech more eloquent in the cause of liberty, than the one we had just listened to from the lips of that hunted fugitive. So I believed at that time,--such is my belief now. I reminded the audience of the peril which surrounded this self-emancipated young man at the North, --even in Massachusetts, on the soil of the Pilgrim Fathers, among the descendants of revolutionary sires; and I appealed to them, whether they would ever allow him to be carried back into slavery,--law or no law, constitution or no constitution. The response was unanimous and in thunder-tones--"NO!" "Will you succor and protect him as a brother-man--a resident of the old Bay State?" "YES!" shouted the whole mass, with an energy so startling, that the ruthless tyrants south of Mason and Dixon's line might almost have heard the mighty burst of feeling, and recognized it as the pledge of an invincible determination, on the part of those who gave it, never to betray him that wanders, but to hide the outcast, and firmly to abide the consequences.
Explanation:
The answer is true. the Vice pesident and the presiding officer of the Senate are the same thing.
