2. How many states can a candidate win and still lose the election

History

1 answer:

oksian1 [2.3K]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Generally, this does not happen.

Explanation:

Generally, this does not happen. The candidate who receives the most votes in a state at the general election will be the candidate for whom the electors later cast their votes. The candidate who wins in a state is awarded all of that state's Electoral College votes.

You might be interested in

Which argument is chamberlain trying to communicate in this passage?

gayaneshka [121]

The following text is an excerpt from a speech given by Neville Chamberlain that was broadcast on British radio on September 27, 1938.

After Hitler rejected British and French concessions to give Germany parts of the Sudetenland, the British people began to prepare for war. Bomb drills were held and people began to dig trenches.

Which argument is Chamberlain trying to communicate in this passage?

War is terrible and should only be entered into with clear justification.

War is a necessary evil that often results in a lasting peace.

War is scary, but it is the only way to stop aggressive nations.

War should only be undertaken when a country can be assured of victory.

Answer: War is terrible and should only be entered into with clear justification.

Explanation:

This speech by the British Prime Minister was broadcasted after the negotiations with Adolf Hitler, German Chancellor at the time, to reach a peaceful resolution to the Sudeten quarrel had failed, as Hitler refused to accept the annexation of only some areas of the Sudetenland.

Therefore, Chamberlain explains that is time to consider the possibility of having to go to war as justified, despite being always a horrible event.

5 0

3 years ago

What noble refused to come to the feast in macbeth?

NemiM [27]

Macduff was the noble that refused to come to the feast.

7 0

4 years ago

What do you make of the assertion that inequality is the opposite of freedom, and what does that mean for freedom-loving people

Over [174]

The assertion that inequality is the opposite of freedom is true because its makes people to feels inferior and its suppresses the individual right in that society.

<h3>What is Inequality?</h3>

Inequality means the act of unequal distribution of resources and opportunities among the members of given society

<h3>What is Freedom?</h3>

Freedom means the act of being liberal which every human is entitled to.

So, the assertion that inequality is the opposite of freedom is true because its makes people to feels inferior and its suppresses the individual right in that society.