Dred Scott Vs. Stanford case was heard in Supreme court of US which issued its final ruling saying that Africans whether free or slaves were not the citizens of US.
Explanation:
Dred Scott who is a plaintiff and a slave was bought by John Emerson in Missouri. Later Emerson came along with Dred Scott to Illinois where Scott married and as they were returning to Missouri, Emerson died. Now Dred Scott decided to sue for his freedom in the federal court. He claimed he was free as he lived in the free state.
Robert Taney who was the chief justice issued the land mark decision that African american though free or slave were not the citizen of US and hence Dred Scott had no right to sue in the federal court. Dred Scott lost his case and this ruling was condemned universally as one of the racism based verdicts which paved way for the amendments of the statutes pertaining to the rights of African Americans.
Answer:
d. Formal
Explanation:
Formal analysis: The term "formal analysis" is described as one of the specific types of "visual description" or is considered as an important technique to organize "visual information".
Formal analysis is considered as a particular explanation related to visual structure in such a way that a few visual elements are supposed to be function and arranged withing a specific composition and therefore formal analysis is not responsible for evoking a particular piece of work in any of the reader's mind.
Formal analysis can be applied in a variety of work including art, cultural artifact, sculpture, or painting, etc.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the formal analysis.
Answer:
An individual's social identity indicates who they are in terms of the groups to which they belong. Social identity groups are usually defined by some physical, social, and mental characteristics of individuals.
Explanation:
Answer: Sutton's offense will not be recorded because it is part of what is called the dark figure of the crime.
Explanation:
In the field of criminology or sociology, the dark figure of the crime can be defined as the number of crimes that have not been reported or discovered.
Just as many reported crimes are seen daily and investigations to find out who has committed it, there are also times where crimes cannot be proven due to lack of evidence or perhaps they happened but were never reported.
Situations have been seen where innocent people are convicted of poor evidence or people who are guilty but lack of evidence cannot ensure that the person is guilty. There are also cases where there are crimes that are not reported because the person does not trust justice or the person may feel guilty for what happened to him.
In the case of Sutton, although it is true that at the end of the day he did not steal anything and that the owner of the house could not detect anything because everything was intact, this does not mean that the crime did not happen. If the owner of the house had security cameras or found Sutton in the house, it would have been proof that he was trying to steal even if he didn't carry anything.
If Sutton had been found there would be chances of being imprisoned or other judicial actions would have been taken because entering a house without permission and that is a crime.
Answer:
Poor working conditions, low wages, and hazards of industrialization
hope this helps mate :)
