1.) 100 million
2.) 20 million
3.) 77%
4.) 150%
5.) The Embargo Act of 1807 was lifted, allowing the US to export goods.
I hope this helps you with your worksheet. :)
Answer:
a) As stated in the passage "It began with pragmatic policies of tolerance. Akbar had inherited the throne, at the age of 13, in 1556. In 1579 he abolished the jiziya, a tax imposed on all but the poorest non-Muslims. This was the most notable in a series of measures to recruit the Hindu majority and others to the cause of unifying and expanding his empire........he preferred incentives to coercion. He defeated the war-like Rajputs, but gave them rank and married their princesses, who were permitted to conduct Hindu rites in the harem. The Mughal-Rajput alliance was a bulwark of his empire." which explains how there was a political improvement from the conditions created by religious policies.
b) "Akbar constructed a religious ideology that served to hold together a diffuse polity....he preferred incentives to coercion....notable in a series of measures to recruit the Hindu majority and others to the cause of unifying and expanding his empire." As stated in the texts his most notable series of measure he has taken is unifying and creating a government with a Muslim-Hindu relations, the religious policies themselves tore apart the empire, but Akbar was able to unify by making sure others feel included.
c) "...jiziya, a tax imposed on all but the poorest non-Muslims", this consequence on religious minorities took a whole a new level when the policy was created. This policy created inequality for specifically the poor non-Muslims, separating Muslims and non-Muslims and from rich and poor.
Explanation:
Don't forget to paraphrase! Glad I was a help!
Answer:
john carl the second ghzgjigds
The correct answer is <span>sarbanes-oxley act
This was an act that was devised to find a way to punish any company that was involved in malpractice or fraud. A part of this act was the whistle-blower act which protected people from retribution in cases in which employees would report to the police if they witnessed anything illegal done by the company executives.</span>
