Answer:
Reliable sources
- Recent statistics and information
- Author and source listed
- .gov or .eud sites
UNreliable sources
- 20 year old statistics
- No author or sources listed
- .com or .net
Answer:
take the case to the United States Supreme Court
Explanation:
From the scenario given, it can be inferred that the case has been decided at the court of the first instance, which is the lower court.
Also, the court has been decided at the first appellate court, which is the court of appeals. Then If Wag's lawyer wants to appeal this decision, (, the decision of the court of appeal) he will " take the case to the United States Supreme Court."
This is because it is the Supreme Court that has jurisdiction over the appeal courts.
Note: since it is not specified that the case is exclusive of the state laws, then it is assumed that the automobile accident, in this case, involved federal laws.
Hence, the next step is to "take the case to the United States Supreme Court"
Each state had to ratify the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution is the correct answer. Good job.
In this case, the doctrine the court was applying is the rule of reason.According to this judicial doctrine of antitrust law, it is a violation to take any action that will put an unreasonable restraint on trade.
