1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ronch [10]
3 years ago
14

The general who surrendered to the American army at Yorktown was _____________ . A) Cornwallis B) Jones C) Benedict

History
2 answers:
velikii [3]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

A) Cornwallis

Explanation:

In oct 19 1781 the british charels cornwails surrended his army to General George Washington at Yorktown

Nadya [2.5K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

A. Cornwallis

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which statements describe the economy of Roman ?
Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer:

Wealthy people could use their power to influence government.

Rich people used enslaved persons and servants to farm their estates

People who lived in poverty faced very difficult conditions in the city.

The use of enslaved persons led to high unemployment rates

Explanation:

The most notorious generals and political leaders in the Roman Empire were very rich and prestigious. They often led large armies.

Living in the city was horrible cause it was loud and kind of dirty.

1/3 of slaves were working for someone in the roman empire.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were social limitations for african americans in 1865 to 1900?
nataly862011 [7]
No voting
No “white” places
Less exceptance
6 0
3 years ago
In this unit, you learned that Oklahoma experienced a great deal of change in the late
vampirchik [111]

Answer:

Explanation:The dawn of the twentieth century found the region between Kansas and Texas in transition. Once set aside as a permanent home for indigenous and uprooted American Indians, almost two million acres of Indian Territory had been opened to settlement in 1889. Joined with a strip of land above the Texas Panhandle, the two areas were designated "Oklahoma Territory" by an act of Congress the following year. Subsequent additions of land surrendered by tribal governments increased the new territory until it was roughly equal in size to the diminished Indian Territory. Land was the universal attraction, but many white pioneers who rushed into Oklahoma Territory or settled in Indian Territory hoped for a fresh start in a new Eden not dominated by wealth and corporate power. Freedmen dreamed of a new beginning in a place of social justice where rights guaranteed by the Constitution would be respected. Most Native Americans, whose land was being occupied, had come to realize the futility of their opposition to the process that would soon unite the two territories into a single state. A few Indians, most wedded to tribal traditions, simply ignored a process they could not understand and refused to participate in an allotment of land they had once been promised would be theirs "forever."

The birth of the new state occurred in an era of protest and reform. Populist and Progressive currents merged to sweep reform-minded Democrats to an overwhelming victory in 1906 in the selection of delegates to a Constitutional Convention tasked with forging Indian and Oklahoma territories and the Osage Nation into a single state. The constitution drafted at the convention in Guthrie in 1906–07 was not as "radical" as Pres. Theodore Roosevelt suggested, but it did reflect its authors' belief that the will of the people, not powerful corporations, should determine state policy. A series of provisions, including a corporation commission, popular election of many state officials, initiative and referendum, preferential balloting for U.S. senators, a single term for the governor, a weak legislature, and inclusion of details in the constitution normally enacted by statute, reflected the founding fathers' conviction that corporate influence on state government should be held in check.

5 0
3 years ago
HELP ME PLZZZZ ASAP.....................
iris [78.8K]

Answer:IS A

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
In Hinduism, according to karma, what should happen if you do nice things for others? A. You will store up riches in heaven. B.
julia-pushkina [17]

Answer:

C. You will be treated the same in return.

Explanation:

Karma is the principle of cause and effect. So whatever you say/think/do, contributes to karma.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Eisenhower’s middle way affect the economy?
    6·1 answer
  • Which trend has reflected the increasing pluralism in United States society in recent years?
    8·1 answer
  • Many scholars consider the Civil War as the first modern war in history. Give at least three reasons why they consider it a mode
    9·1 answer
  • What is Queen Elizabeth I famous for?
    12·1 answer
  • How are democratic ideals reflected in the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. ( three sentences)
    11·1 answer
  • Who was the leading general and prime minister of Japan during World War II?
    13·1 answer
  • What was the fate of the Wade–Davis Bill? Congress rejected the bill but Lincoln approved it. It became law after Lincoln signed
    10·1 answer
  • What inspired a second wave of the women’s movement
    14·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST FOR CORRECT ANSWER
    5·2 answers
  • How was your day and if bad i hope it gets better
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!