1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
borishaifa [10]
2 years ago
5

What did Europe look like before the war? What kind of things were going on?

History
1 answer:
kotykmax [81]2 years ago
8 0

Explanation:

Europe in the early 20th century had known no great war, involving all the Continent’s major Powers, since the fall of Napoleon. Although European society had been transformed in the interim, the changes had made war more difficult rather than impossible, and the underpinnings of the long 19th-century peace had grown fragile.

Globalization

Characteristic of the pre-1914 decades was what we would now call globalization. Trade may have risen from one thirtieth to one third of world production between 1800 and 1913; between 1855 and 1914 investment flows grew 20 times. Europe accounted for nearly two thirds of global trade and even more of global investment, and from the 1890s Europe’s major currencies were fixed in value in relation to each other under the international gold standard. Hundreds of thousands of foreign-born labourers worked in the heavy industries of French Lorraine and Germany’s Ruhr. The British writer Norman Angell in his 1909 best-seller, Europe’s Optical Illusion, maintained that war between advanced modern economies was now irrational.[1] Yet British naval planners saw economic interdependence as making Germany more vulnerable, and the German General Staff considered war remained a viable option, at least if victory came quickly.

Democratization

A second 19th-century characteristic was democratization. By 1914 all the European Powers had elected lower houses of parliament, and a majority of the adult male population was enfranchised. The press was relatively free, and citizens could form parties and pressure groups. Nonetheless, in Austria-Hungary, Germany, and Russia ministers answered to monarchs rather than to a parliamentary majority, and the military chiefs were not subordinate to civilian statesmen. Moreover, as international tension mounted, public opinion polarized, more moderate and progressive tendencies being offset by nationalism and militarism. Europe’s socialist parties opposed wars of conquest and aggression but were willing to endorse a war fought for just cause and in self-defence, which in 1914 all the governments would claim to be fighting.

Military revolutions

The 19th century had also witnessed a succession of military revolutions. At sea, steel had superseded wooden hulls and steam had superseded sail. HMS Dreadnought, launched by Britain in 1906 with turbine engines and 10 12-inch guns, made all existing battleships obsolete. On land, Prussia’s combination of universal liability to conscription, forward strategic planning by a General Staff, and railway-borne mobilization helped win the wars of German unification, and was widely emulated. Breech-loading cannon with rifled steel barrels replaced smooth-bore muzzle-loaders, and infantry rifles replaced muskets. Smokeless high explosive replaced powder in bullets and shells, and the modern field gun fired up to 20 rounds per minute. Yet although on balance these developments favoured defenders over attackers, military planners concluded from the 1904-05 Russo-Japanese War that offensive tactics could still prevail, albeit at much higher cost than before.

You might be interested in
Many african americans supported marcus garvey because they liked the idea of
azamat

Answer: Getting away from discrimination in America

4 0
3 years ago
Communities in the South refused to address the problems of inequality and racism. What solution did Martin Luther King Jr. prop
iren [92.7K]

Answer:

He worked and preached against the violent tension

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
What was the consequence of brooks's beating of sumner in the north? The south?
viva [34]

This event is known as the Caning of Charles Sumner, and it took place on May 22, 1856. On this date, Representative Preston Brooks, who was a supporter of slavery, attacked Senator Charles Sumner, who was an abolitionist. He used a cane to do so, leading to the name of the event.

The issue shocked people due to its violence, and it led to the development of even more division between the North and the South. In the North, Brooks was seen as a savage, and Sumner as a martyr. People were enraged, and they believed the episode was an example of the lack of tolerance displayed in the South. On the other hand, the event was supported by many in the South, as they believed it demonstrated the weakness of the Northerners.

5 0
3 years ago
____________ passed a resolution for a convention to revise the Articles of Confederation.
melisa1 [442]
D) Constitutional Convention
4 0
2 years ago
Describe the causes of the undeclared war with france, and explain adams's decision to seek peace rather than declare war
dusya [7]

The French were infuriated at Jay’s Treaty•Instead of fighting France, Adams sent envoys to try to make peace with France•The envoys were met with bribes, but refused what would be called the XYZ affair•Adams was able to restrict fighting to the West Indies7.Describe the poisonous political atmosphere that produced the Alien and Sedition Acts andthe Kentucky and Virginia resolutions.•The Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans despised each other, and theFederalist Congress wanted them out of the country•The Alien Laws made it legal to deport “dangerous” foreigners, most of them poorDemocratic Republicans•The Sedition Act made it illegal for someone to speak out against the government, adirect encroachment of the rights in the Bill of Rights•The reaction was the Virginia and Kentucky resolutions made it possible to nullifyCongressional decisions8.Describe the contrasting membership and principles of the Hamiltonian Federalists and theJeffersonian Republicans, and how they laid the foundations of the American political partysystem.•The Democratic-Republicans believed in states’ rights, a Franco-American Alliance,a strict interpretation of the Constitution, and the removal of the national bank•The Federalists supported Hamilton’s financial policies, favored loose interpretationof the Constitution, and enjoyed a more powerful federal government•This set the stage for the political parties’ arguments during the election of 1800
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why would the vice president take over the president's job? Who becomes president if the vice-president cannot serve as presiden
    14·2 answers
  • Three of the following were true of the Catholic Church in Europe during the Middle Ages. Which was NOT?
    14·1 answer
  • What was Friedrich Froebel known for inventing?
    15·1 answer
  • Wich of these groups benefited from the proclamation of 1763?
    14·2 answers
  • What did the case of Sweatt vs. Painter accomplish?
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement best explains the cartoon's meaning? It threatens colonies that refuse to join the plan of union. It criticizes
    5·1 answer
  • 6. What provisions were included in the Articles for a federal government? Did limiting the powers of the federal government neg
    15·1 answer
  • The 1968 Tet offensive Group of answer choices All the given answers are correct. was a substantial military victory for the Uni
    7·1 answer
  • What were THREE reasons that the English government desired to colonize North America?
    10·2 answers
  • List the events in order in which they occurred,from least to greatest
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!