"I would give him a score of about 5 out of 10, which was a vast improvement over John Q. Adams and his cronies. If you were a poor, white male, he was your guy. He greatly democratized the process of elections in that era and was our first grassroots president. However, Jackson usually did what Jackson wanted to do, even if it meant alienating many of the people who got him elected. He did not side with Southerners during the nullification crisis and was prepared to use troops against South Carolina to enforce a law that most Southerners hated. He blatantly ignored John Marshall’s decision in Worcester v. Georgia, but an argument could be made here that he was acting in favor of democracy in this case, as most white Southerners probably wanted the Cherokee moved off of their land. He was a very complex and fascinating guy, but his critics called him King Andrew for a reason." -Robert Marshall
They often called themselves independant hope this helps
I’m confused on what you are asking
Answer:
Coercive Power
Explanation:
Coercive control is a manager's ability to compel an employee to obey an order by endangering the employee with retribution if the employee refuses to comply with the order, It is the power holder's right to withhold something from a individual, or punish them for failing to comply with a request.
Coercive influence gives a leader leverage of what's going on in their organisation. It ensures discipline among staff, enforces organizational policies and ensures a harassment-free atmosphere. Coercive power should only be used very sparingly and when there is no other options as there are disadvantages associated with it.
<span>somewhat restructure the Soviet Union, while maintaining union
hope this helps
</span>
