1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olga nikolaevna [1]
3 years ago
9

Killing that is done with malice, but without premeditation or deliberation

Law
1 answer:
artcher [175]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:Second-degree murder is killing that is done with malice, but without premeditation or deliberation. That is, the intent to kill did not exist until the moment of the murder. ... Involuntary manslaughter is a killing in which there is no intent to kill at all.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Who is NOT typically found in the courtroom?
Sholpan [36]

The Answer is D........

7 0
3 years ago
Campaigns are expensive. Do you believe that this has had an influence on
lisov135 [29]

Answer:

yhh because when campaigns are expensive d ppl don't u she d money given to dem for developmental projects buh rather squander it on the campaign

4 0
3 years ago
Miranda rights must be advised only when a person is in custody.<br> True<br> False
ludmilkaskok [199]

Answer:

true

Explanation:

Miranda applies only to custodial interrogations, which means the police don't have to give Miranda warnings every time they question or talk to someone. Miranda rights come into play when the police arrest or detain someone. Detention here means that the person reasonably believes he or she is not free to leave.

6 0
3 years ago
Qdjewkhpwiudofh ehfrhfhreuihvfiudsvhkfdsnvjklsnvkjfhui
Firdavs [7]
Thanks for the points big bro the pictures are pretty cool
( can i get brainliest)
8 0
3 years ago
A homeowner sued a contractor in federal court for damages resulting from an unsuccessful roof repair. However, the homeowner fa
denis23 [38]

Answer: No, because a dismissal based on lack of personal jurisdiction is not on the merits.

Explanation:

Following the information given in the question, it should be noted that the case should not be dismissed by the court due to the fact that the dismissal is based on the lack of personal jurisdiction.

It should be noted that the claim preclusion should be added to the answer of the defendant as it's an affirmative defense and it requires more than the claimant bringing a case against the same defendant.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • if a company filed a civil suit against the internal revenue service which court would most likely hear the case
    11·1 answer
  • Although California law doesn't assess any penalties against an entity that doesn't follow the notification law, it does permit
    15·1 answer
  • Law that establishes a ban on writing threats to the President of the United Stateswould most likely receive the following type
    5·1 answer
  • 12. What is the meaning of the supremacy clause?
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following is an example of how the U.S. Constitution limits government power through checks and balances?
    5·1 answer
  • The diagram above identifies the steps in becoming a U.S. citizen. Which of the following best completes the diagram?
    8·1 answer
  • Was a leader chosen in your group? Did a leader emerge? (In complete sentences and take your time please and thank you)
    11·1 answer
  • Do maryland officers have to let victims know their rights
    6·1 answer
  • Status offenses are violations of the law:
    11·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of the fair credit billing act and the electronic fund transfer act.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!