Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

13

In order for a plaintiff to win a case involving intentional infliction of emotional distress, she must prove the defendant acte

d in an extreme and outrageous manner. True or False

1 answer:

Ratling [72]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

False

Explanation:

If she proves that she committed a crime and went against the law that is enough. Nothing to much more than that matters.

You might be interested in

A licensed driver who is 17 years of age may not operate a motor vehicle between ___, unless accompanied by a driver who is 21 y

GalinKa [24]

1:00 a.m. and 5:00 a.m.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What computer crimes are covered by State laws?

lisabon 2012 [21]

Answer:

I assume you want to know what computer-based crimes are against the law and have consequences.

Explanation:

Online Identity Theft, Obtaining information concerning a person, Obtaining information for free that costs the public a fee, Encrypting or decrypting data, etc. In certain states like Alaska these are considered as a Class C felony.

(P.S. FindLaw is a good website to help with subjects like this)

8 0

3 years ago

Discuss THREE contributing factors that led to human rights violation that you have chosen<br>

Roman55 [17]

Poverty, lack of education, and lack of law enforcement.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If two oxygen shares 2 electrons to foms O2 molecule , why two carbon atoms don't shares 4 electrons to form C2 molecule ?

Ainat [17]

Answer:

You posted this as a law subject question.

You will have better luck in science.

3 0

3 years ago

16% of all distracted driving crashes involve drivers under the age of 20.<br> a) True<br> b) False

m_a_m_a [10]

Your answer would be False love!

8 0

4 years ago