1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KIM [24]
3 years ago
13

In order for a plaintiff to win a case involving intentional infliction of emotional distress, she must prove the defendant acte

d in an extreme and outrageous manner. True or False
Law
1 answer:
Ratling [72]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

False

Explanation:

If she proves that she committed a crime and went against the law that is enough. Nothing to much more than that matters.

You might be interested in
To obtain a class E license, you don’t need to
pashok25 [27]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

because whoever created the rules socks

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
You may NOT cross a solid yellow line to _____.
Mila [183]
Pass a driver infront of you
3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is the term often used by law-enforcement to describe the neighborhood of patrol officers assigned
wlad13 [49]
Answer: we need a,b,c,d to find out




Explanation: didn’t help
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
To become a detective how long do you have to go to college for. Also what kind of work would you be doing?
Marysya12 [62]

Detectives and criminal investigators are uniformed or plainclothes officers who gather facts and collect evidence related to criminal cases. They conduct interviews, examine records, monitor suspects, and participate in raids and arrests

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What more, if anything, must the trial court find in order to sustain the defendant's Sixth Amendment claim
Free_Kalibri [48]

The trial court must find a witness in order to sustain the defendant's Sixth Amendment claim.

<h3>Sixth Amendment Claim</h3>
  • The rights of criminal defendants are guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, including the right to an impartial jury, the right to an impartial judge, the right to a public trial without undue delay, and the right to know your accusers and the details of the allegations and evidence against you.
  • It has been put to the test most visibly in a number of cases concerning terrorism, but it appears much more frequently in matters requiring, for instance, jury selection or witness protection.
  • The accused has the legal right to a quick and open trial by an impartial jury of the state and district where the offense was committed, such district shall have been determined in advance by law, in all criminal cases.

To learn more about the Sixth Amendment Claim refer to:

brainly.com/question/905718

#SPJ4

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Instead of directly addressing the problem, an abuser will medicate it away by indirectly denying its impact for a short while.
    13·1 answer
  • What two exams does the state require to graduate
    8·2 answers
  • Explain the ceremonial and real executive functions of the president in the presidential system of government
    7·2 answers
  • Do you think it was important for congress to finish what they started?
    12·1 answer
  • Discuss the requirements of police operation ?​
    10·1 answer
  • How do other branches of the American government limit the power that the Supreme Court has?
    10·1 answer
  • Successful coping skills can be_______.
    12·1 answer
  • What was happening in the 1960's that changed Policing?
    8·1 answer
  • • J20P13Q3 Explain how the system of precedent
    15·1 answer
  • What is the most accurate description of the criminal justice system?​
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!