Answer: Automatically
Explanation: The warranty of merchantability could be explained as a guarantee that a product purchased will meet the usual and regular standard or requirement of such product. Under the Uniform Commercial Code, the warranty of merchantability is implied as this automatic unless the defects in the regular nature or specification of the product is clearly stated. In the scenario above, the warranty of implied merchantability automatically arises in the sale of the trampolines and as such, the trampoline must meet the regular standard of the product since no defect is explicitly stated in the regular specification.
Answer:
Option 4 is definitely correct: Whether real GDP increased cannot be determined with the information given.
Explanation:
The information that is given only states that there has been an increase in the market value of final goods and services in two years. So, we cannot conclude that production increased in Rushya or average price levels increased there as per Option A and C respectively, because market value can be increased by both increase in production or price levels. Even Option B cannot be concluded as the real GDP is dependent on other variables as compared to the total market value.
Thus, only appropriate statement is option D: we cannot determine increase in real GDP with the given information.
Answer:. ............$
1. Bad debt Dr. 11.0000
Account receivable Or. 11.000
Narration: Bad debts writing off debtors
2. Cash/Bank. Dr 1800
Profit or loss Cr. 1800
Narration. Bad debt previously written off recovered
3. Profit or loss Dr 4000
Allowance for doubtful debts Cr
4000
Narration. Increase in provision for doubtful debts.
Answer:
d. The higher the risk, the lower the possible investment.
Explanation:
With regards to speculation, hazard can be characterized as the changeability of return. the contrast between real result and expected result can be called as hazard. In the given model, Sandy think about that there is a positive connection between the likelihood of hazard and returns. for example on the off chance that there is high hazard, the likelihood of getting returns is high. in the event that there is less hazard, the likelihood of getting returns is low.
Right now, likes to go with if the higher the hazard, the lower the potential ventures, in light of the fact that the inconstancy of profits is high. Means the financial specialist could conceivably get the profits, consequently they may like to go with certain and ensured returns than dubious more significant yields. In the region of ventures it is a typical inquiry to all, some may go with higher the hazard the lower the conceivable speculation.
Henceforth, the appropriate response is option D.
In the event that an announcement is there that the higher the hazard, the bigger the potential returns, it doesn't imply that the speculator gets more significant yields with his ventures. the odds are there to get more significant yields simultaneously there are a few issues moreover.
Answer:
It has a greater impact than service industries.
Explanation:
