Answer:
The correct option is;
(3) The sample of track athletes show that there is a correlation between foot size and running speed
Step-by-step explanation:
The statements are analysed as follows;
(1) Smaller foot sizes cause track athletes to run slower.
The above statement is a conclusion and it infers more information than is contained in the question statement because there are other factors such as taller athletes run faster than average sized athletes
(2) The sample of track athletes shows a causal relationship between
foot size and running speed.
The above statement is similar to the one above as it is a milder conclusion and it infers more information than is contained in the question statement
(3) The sample of track athletes shows a correlation between foot size
and running speed.
The above statement is correct as is directly supported by the data as it is a statement made based directly the data
(4) There is no correlation between foot size and running speed in
track athletes.
The above statement is not supported by the available data.
Answer:
To identify which integer does not belong with the rest, we must first evaluate each.
Step-by-step explanation:
- [25.6...] is already evaluated. Therefore, let's move on to Integer <em>b: </em>
, where is <em>x </em>is 48.
- 48 = 2 * 24--> 2 * 12--> 2 * 6--> 2 * 3
- √48 =
* 2 * 2 * 2 * 3
- We have 1 perfect sqaure: * 2
- When we multiply, we receive 2.
- Therefore, 2 *
- When -51/2 is relatively prime, we receive -25 1/2
- Finally, the last integer is already simplified.
Based on these results, you may determine the number that does not belong with the other three, whether than is through means of irrationability, value, absolte value, or whatever other means you decide.
Answer:
If you said its the height it would be 21
Step-by-step explanation:
The height is on the side
Answer: The first situation fit the equation and it will take Mitch 4.5 weeks to pay back
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
area becomes 2²=4 times.
