1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Setler79 [48]
2 years ago
9

Why do the Progressives believe that the separation of powers and checks and balances were unnecessary?

History
1 answer:
GalinKa [24]2 years ago
3 0

The Constitution of the United States was initially very controversial. Opponents feared it gave far too much power to the federal government and nearly blocked its ratification.

Today, the great document is revered by most Americans, but there is growing opposition to our Constitutional system. The 21st century opposition comes from the opposite direction: Progressives believe “rigid adherence to past versions of limited government (must) be discarded.” They want a far more powerful federal government and governing bureaucracy.

It’s important to recognize that the progressive challenge to the Constitution is not merely about the size of government. It’s not about how much money they want to spend on new government programs. Whenever sustainable and broad public support is found for such programs, these “big government” views can easily be accommodated within the Constitutional structure.

That wouldn’t surprise the founders of our nation at all. They clearly understood that the power of government could sometimes be used to further the public good.

But the founders also recognized that there was another reality to consider. As James Madison put it in Federalist 41, any “power to advance the public happiness involves a discretion that may be misapplied and abused.” Their struggle to find the right balance was eloquently expressed by Madison in Federalist 51:

“If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.”

The problem, simply put, is human nature. If you give someone power, sooner or later it will have a corrupting influence on them.

The solution arrived at in our Constitution was to create a powerful government, but to separate its powers so no one person or faction could wield that power alone. There would be checks and balances throughout the system, a precaution Madison viewed as “necessary to control the abuses of government.”

The Madisonian system of checks and balances has served our nation well, but it is deeply frustrating to many progressives today. From the progressive perspective, Constitutional checks and balances represent a messy and inefficient process that blocks decisive government action.

Their analysis is correct.

It’s embarrassing at times when the separation of powers is displayed in a public spat between House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and President Donald Trump. Disheartening as such displays may be, the ugly competition prevents either from unilaterally imposing their views on the nation. That’s what Madison had in mind when he wrote that “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition.”

Progressives are also right that our system of checks and balances can be inefficient. Congress and the president often disagree. So do the House and Senate. And then the courts get involved. Sometimes there are challenges from state governments. The entire process slows things down and generates more modest results.

Much to the chagrin of progressives, that’s the whole idea. The messiness and inefficiency are features not bugs. Because government power can be used for both good and evil, the Constitution requires leaders to build a broad public consensus before that power can be unleashed.

For those who want more government power unleashed, that is a fundamental problem with our Constitution. A pair of law professors from Harvard and Chicago — Eric A. Posner and Adrian Vermeule — believe concern about checks and balances stems from an irrational American “fear of dictatorship.” They call it “tyrannophobia” and are upset that such attitudes were “reflected in the Declaration of Independence and founding debates.”

Not surprisingly, these scholars dismiss Madison’s system as an irrelevant “historical curiosity.” What concerns them is not a fear that government power will be abused. Instead, they worry that lingering “tyrannophobia” is preventing our nation from turning over enough power to presidents and bureaucrats.

It is hard to imagine a more fundamental rejection of our Constitutional order.

Scott Rasmussen is an American political analyst and digital media entrepreneur. He is the author of “The Sun is Still Rising: Politics Has Failed But America Will Not.”

If you want more information just look up your question on the internet and read some articles.

You might be interested in
James Madison declared, “Liberty may be endangered by the abuses of liberty as well as the abuses of power.” This statement refl
qaws [65]
<span>Americans take this view because of what the people is doing right now. We are given too much freedom and liberty that sometimes we forgot if what we are doing is right or wrong. Posts in social medias about accidents that should have been filtered and not publicized to gain what? Fame? Are we not concerned about the privacy of the person being murdered and respect him/her by not publicizing it? Sometimes we are full of ourselves that we forgot the value of the person who suffered or we feel like what we did is right. The liberty that is most valued is the private liberty, those who are to be kept confidential. </span>
3 0
3 years ago
5. The Red secret police, known as the Cheka, began
Alona [7]
5) The Red secret police, known as the Cheka, began <span>A Red terror campaign to destroy all those who opposed the new regime.

6) </span><span>The concept of total war means that  </span>a war that involves the complete mobilization of resources and people, affecting the lives of all citizens in the warring countries, even those remote from the battlefields
5 0
2 years ago
Which factor most contributed to the development of mills in the North?
Rudik [331]
I think it is B because they had fertile farmland
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In which country did Lech Walesa and Pope John Paul II play a role in ending communism?
anygoal [31]

Answer:

The correct answer is POLAND.

Explanation:

Lech Walesa is a former Polish President who declared that Saint Pope John Paul II had a pivotal role in ending communism in Poland, their country.

Walesa was struggling against communism for a long time when a Polish became Pope and decided to visit the country. This was a turning point in Polish political history since it paved the way for the end of communism in 1979.

4 0
3 years ago
Which three choices are positive effects of the Pax Romana ("the time of Roman peace"), which lasted from around 27 BC until AD
Kisachek [45]
<span>A) Slavery was abolished, the Colosseum was built and the empire expanded. In this time, tranquility ceased to exist, slavery and the rulers built social and public works. C) The Coliseum was built, the empire expanded and more public works were built. It was the construction of the Coliseum and different works, the empire was also developed until reaching its maximum power and success. D) The emperors waged wars with the surrounding territories, more public works were built and fewer farmers were needed. The war ceased during a time of intense peace and tranquility, lived by the Roman Empire, where it reached its maximum economic development and territorial expansion.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The bill of rights was added to the constitution
    12·1 answer
  • What were some factors that led to the Stock Market Crash of 1929?
    10·1 answer
  • Which president was president when peace corps was enacted?
    14·2 answers
  • Who was the president in Russia 1876
    12·1 answer
  • What is the difference between the national debt and the deficit
    15·2 answers
  • What is the term for an electorate’s right to vote directly for or against legislative measures?
    5·1 answer
  • The Protestant reformation In England: was lead by John calvin
    5·1 answer
  • Do you think social Darwinist are around today?
    8·1 answer
  • Plz help in a history quiz
    5·1 answer
  • Conditions in Factories in 1800s
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!