Answer:
emotional arousal
Explanation:
Emotional arousal: In psychology, the term emotional arousal is determined as an individual experiencing a specific state of "heightened physiological activity". While experiencing an emotional arousal, an individual feels strong emotions, for example, fear, anger, etc and therefore a person goes to the state of emotional arousal because of his or her day-to-day life experiences.
Examples of emotional arousal may include "freeze, flight, or fight response".
In the question above, the given type of body language usually indicates emotional arousal.
Answer:
Explanation:
Imagine that instead of sky scrapers we had all the offices in them occupying lots. It would be somewhat like a mid west city like Great Falls Montana. I'm asking you to see New York as you would see Great Falls.
Great falls has some buildings that are 2 stories -- none that are much more that I know of. Great Falls has a population of 40000 roughly. New York has a population of about 8000000. So to construct New York on a Great Falls model, you would need 200 communities the size of Great Falls. Consider what that would do the environment.
The connection to each place of business and residential area would be many many times larger. Waste would create an immense almost unimaginable problem. The environment wouldn't know how to handle the spread created by small residential homes and no more than 1 or 2 story buildings.
The spread would create many times the problems that skyscrapers create and that's only 1 problem.
Question 2
This is a hard question. It depends on the slave owners. Some would think of their slaves as human beings same as them. Some were taught to read and write along with the owner's children. Most were not. Some were taught some sort of religious principles. Many were not. Some wanted freedom, others did not.
There's no simple answer to this. The economy of the south depended on slaves. No matter how humane the owners, there was still work to be done.
Answer:Sociological research is especially important with respect to public policy debates. The political controversies that surround the question of how best to respond to terrorism and violent crime are difficult to resolve at the level of political rhetoric. Often, in the news and in public discourse, the issue is framed in moral terms and therefore, for example, the policy alternatives get narrowed to the option of either being “tough” or “soft” on crime. Tough and soft are moral categories that reflect a moral characterization of the issue. A question framed by these types of moral categories cannot be resolved using evidence-based procedures. Posing the debate in these terms narrows the range of options available and undermines the ability to raise questions about what responses to crime actually work.
In fact policy debates over terrorism and crime seem especially susceptible to the various forms of specious, unscientific reasoning described later in this chapter. The story of the isolated individual, whose specific act of violence becomes the basis for the belief that the criminal justice system as a whole has failed, illustrates several qualities of unscientific thinking: knowledge based on casual observation, knowledge based on over-generalization, and knowledge based on selective evidence. The sociological approach to policy questions is essentially different since it focuses on examining the effectiveness of different social control strategies for addressing different types of violent behaviour and the different types of risk to public safety. Thus, from a sociological point of view, it is crucial to think systematically about who commits violent acts and why.
Although moral claims and opinions are of interest to sociologists, sociological researchers use empirical evidence (that is, evidence corroborated by direct experience and/or observation) combined with the scientific method to deliver sound sociological research. A truly scientific sociological study of the social causes that lead to terrorist or criminal violence would involve a sequence of prescribed steps: defining a specific research question that can be answered through empirical observation; gathering information and resources through detailed observation; forming a hypothesis; testing the hypothesis in a reproducible manner; analyzing and drawing conclusions from the data; publishing the results; and anticipating further development when future researchers respond to and re-examine the findings.
Explanation: The major factors responsible for these experimentations had earlier being revealed and portrayed.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": It is a double-barreled question.
Explanation:
Double-barreled questions usually have 2 questions joined into one. However, the answer to the complete question may not necessarily comply with the answer for each individual question. In the case, it is stated:
<em><u>"I frequently solve</u></em><em> and </em><em><u>enjoy solving crossword puzzles."</u></em>
The fact that <em>"I frequently solve puzzles"</em> doesn't necessarily mean that <em>"I enjoy solving crossword puzzles"</em>, since one can solve puzzles just to make time, boredom or any other reason. To sum up, in the case of a double-barreled question the answer only responds to most part of it.
