<u>Answer:</u>
<em>It shows that Jim is comfortable enough with Huck to share his negative opinion of two men. </em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
The effect of Jim’s dialogues in the story is significant for the reader to understand the relationship or the bond which Huck and Jim shares. Jim, has some negative opinions about Huck. However, he is comfortable with Huck in sharing his negative opinions about the two men. He finds Huck trustworthy in this scenario.
Answer:
Orwell makes extensive use of animal sounds and movements to describe action; his figurative usage turns ordinary description into onomatopoeia. Animal characters are "stirring" and "fluttering" in movement while "cheeping feebly" and "grunting" communications. Old Major, the father figure of the animal's revolution, sings the rallying song "Beasts of England." Orwell describes the answering chorus in a frenzy of onomatopoeic imagery: "the cows lowed it, the dogs whined it, the sheep bleated it, the ducks quacked it." As the ruling class of pigs becomes more human, Orwell subtly drops barnyard verbiage and instead uses "said" for dialogue attributions.
Answer:
wala.Akong ma answer ehh kayu nallanng bahala
Explanation:
nag hahanap din ako ehh
Hey! i think you could maybe start with two animals that are best friends (for example a frog and a duck) one follows the other around where ever he/she goes. that one copies everything he/she does :)
the duck (in example) starts getting very angry that (we’ll use the frog in this case) the frog is coping everything he/she does
this creates conflict :)
some things that your character can do about this situation include
invading their house
coping everything they do
killing them
hope this helps :)
brainliest please