The local government can declare "state of the emergency" when there is civil unrest in their state. For every country, the state of emergency clauses varies. At some point, the basic laws are suspended. The government has the right to decide what they should do in this scenario. However, it must still be in accordance of the human rights
yes, America could still in fact get a large territory. They could get it by force (war), Buy the land, or a treaty. The bigger question however, is it worth doing it. If America wants to get the land by war that just adds to what the're doing in the middle east, and if it's a neighbor next to them (Canada or Mexico) the blood shead could be high because of pupulated cities. As for money or a treaty it wouln't be that much of a risk but it depends on how much money and the details of the treaty.
I am not sure but I going to go with a sorry not sure if that is right answer but I can’t find anything on it
It limited free speech. Pretty much people could not talk bad about the government or the flag.
Answer:
Most casualties and deaths in the Civil War were the result of non-combat-related disease. For every three soldiers killed in battle, five more died of disease.
