Answer: In December 1917, nine months after the disintegration of the Russian monarchy, the army officer corps, one of the dynasty’s prime pillars, finally fell—a collapse that, in light of World War I and the Bolshevik Revolution, historians often treat as inevitable. The Imperial Russian Army in Peace, War, and Revolution, 1856–1917 contests this assumption. By expanding our view of the Imperial Russian Army to include the experience of the enlisted ranks, Roger R. Reese reveals that the soldier’s revolt in 1917 was more social revolution than anti-war movement—and a revolution based on social distinctions within the officer corps as well as between the ranks.
Explanation:
Spanish:
•wanted to convert Indians to Christianity
•wanted to teach Indians Spanish language and customs
•wanted to promote European settlement by providing food and other goods
British:
•little interest in converting Indians to Christianity
•did not try to assimilate Indians into the English way of life
•rarely married Indians
French:
•success depended heavily on maintaining good relations with the Indians
•traded French goods for furs gathered by Indians
•learned American Indian language and customs
•joined Indian tribes
The major difference is that in the alternative A: "The Fifth Amendment's due process clause originally applied only to the Federal Government"; The Fourteenth Amendment expanded the coverage of due process clause when applied it to all states, stating:
<em> "(…) nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws"
</em>
Answer: Von Steuben helped drill George Washington's army and Marquis De Lafayette showed his loyalty to Washington by helping Washington take down military-political plot aimed for George Washington to give up command to Continental Army.
