Answer:
The participants did not realize that the messages were not being transmitted in English and thus in German. Furthermore, they did not realize that the messages were being transmitted backwards.
However, they realized that the message was being conveyed using words rather than non-verbal communication. they also realized when the person who spoke the message was a man or a woman.
Explanation:
This experiment caused the participants to hear two messages that were being transmitted at the same time, after which the participants should hear each message separately. The goal was to find out what our capacity is to absorb information from messages that we don't understand or that our brain rejects because it is something that we don't know how to decode.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
For the ethical researcher, the major problem with deception is that it tends to involve direct attacks on other people’s consent.
And of course, that is not ethical and professional researchers and companies shouldn't ever do that.
Researchers need to be very honest and clear about the purpose of research, the instruments used, the risks -if there are any- and the way results are going to be used.
Researchers also have to get the written consent from the people that are going to be part of the study. This way, participants are going to be aware of any details.
The answer is The Republic of San Marino
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Could a modern president run a government with five cabinet members as Goerge Washington did?
No, of course not. It would be impossible. The reason is that times have changed, the number of people has dramatically increased, necessities are different, and we are living in a completely different world that needs specializations for different areas.
Does a president today need 15 cabinet members?
Yes, probably more, because I have mentioned above, the government faces different responsibilities and conditions that required the specialization of different cabinet members. Internal affairs, the economy of the US, US Politics, social issues are more diverse and complicated than before. Foreign relations are also a critical issue that requires the focus and attention of experts that did not exist in the past.
Answer:
Facial behavior has an innate, unlearned component.
Explanation:
The debate of nature vs. nurture is one of the most important ones in the social sciences. "Nature" states that some traits are innate to humans, and are already within us the moment we are born. On the other hand, "nurture" refers to the idea that it is society that teaches us some of our traits, and we adopt them based on our culture. What this research wants to show is that human facial behaviour has a component that is innate and unlearned.
