This example response shows how someone discusses about: <em>features of Enlightenment thought, features of romantic thought, how the poems are different</em>. The one who answers shows how the poem are different by comparing them, explaining what they both reflect and their perspective of passion. The response can be also part of the discussion of features of Enlightenment thought as well as romantic thought because it can easily be presented by contrasting these thoughts with each other. I mean, if you want to make an argument about what something represents you can compare it with something different to emphasizes its characteristics, as it is done in the excerpt.
Answer and Explanation:
Goli Taraghi presents a very descriptive narrator. This narrator makes extensive use of adjectives full of details that are able to describe and expose to Golior Maraym's striking characteristics, his personality, his position in the face of situations and his behavior. The great importance of this narrator is that he is able to expose Gol-Maraym within the non-linearity that the character presents. That's because Gol-Maraym is a complex and nuanced character. This requires a very dynamic and canny narrator who can expose all these nuances and layers of personality, in addition to the changes presented throughout history.
This evidences the author's talent in building a precise and moldable narration that fits the character, helping the perception of its construction.
Wiesel's overall attitude towards the United States appears to be quite hopeful, in certain aspects. He discusses at length to a degree of how we, as people, we brave - and sought to fight for the greater good. It appears that he is respectful and somewhat grateful. But, there is also a hint of remorse for the lives lost in this war.
Hopefully, this helps! =)
1)Passive
2)Active
3)Active
Answer:true
Explanation: it is true because well personal
hope u found this helpful ÷⊃
