What Moses did NOT learn at his first encounter with God at Horeb (Sinai):
- that God would, by Moses, give Israel the Law there later.
Further details:
The account of Moses' first encounter with God is recorded in Exodus chapter 3. This happened during the years that Moses had fled from Egypt after he had killed an Egyptian overlord who had been beating a Hebrew slave (cf. Exodus 2:11-25). The account of Moses' encounter with God at Horeb begins this way (Exodus 3:1-3 NIV):
- <em>Now Moses was tending the flock of Jethro his father-in-law, the priest of Midian, and he led the flock to the far side of the wilderness and came to Horeb, the mountain of God. There the angel of the Lord appeared to him in flames of fire from within a bush. Moses saw that though the bush was on fire it did not burn up. So Moses thought, “I will go over and see this strange sight—why the bush does not burn up.”</em>
All of the listed items in your question were things that God revealed to Moses through his appearance at the burning bush -- except for the fact that later, on this same mountain, God would deliver the Torah (the Law) for his people Israel. After God used Moses' leadership to deliver the Hebrew people out of Egypt, as they journeyed up toward Canaan (the future land of Israel), they came to the mountain of Sinai and encamped there. The account of Moses' encounters with God again on that mountain, receiving the Law from God, is also recorded in the Book of Exodus, beginning at chapter 19.
Answer:
C. white Southerners who supported the Reconstruction government
Explanation:
It was a derisive term used by white Southern Democrats who opposed Reconstruction legislation.
The 2nd one is the correct answer based on the question's topic
The statement about how Karl Marx and Adam Smith are different would be:
Adam Smith and Karl Marx are polar opposites in the political-economic, in such that Smith would in no way agree<span> with a revolution of the proletariat.
I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
</span>
The correct answer is - True.
Prior to the Mughal invasion, India was divided into multiple smaller Muslim and Hindu kingdoms. They were in constant conflict with one another, and also were not any significant force individually.
The Mughals used this circumstances. They moved south from the Central Asia steppes, and by using the typical Mongol horde-style of warfare managed to defeat these small kingdoms with relative ease. Once they did that, they had under their control most of the northern half of India, and remained in the region for several centuries.
