Answer:
no there wasn't..............
Answer: b. Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.
Explanation:
In the case of Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co in 2007, the US Supreme Court ruled that if claims were based on decisions taken by the employer 180 days ago or more, then the employers CANNOT be sued under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 over race or gender pay discrimination.
Plaintiff's were still however allowed to sue under other laws such as the Equal Pay Act which has a 3 year deadline for most sex discrimination claims.
Congress later reversed this ruling in 2009 with the passing of the LILLY LEDBETTER FAIR PAY ACT.
Answer:
B. modified rebuy
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario the buy class situation is most likely a modified rebuy. This term refers to a buying situation where an person or business buys a product that has been previously purchased and only changes the supplier or another element of the previous order, usually being only a minor modification such as described in the question.
Answer: White-collar crime.
Explanation:
White-collar crime applies to a financial nonviolent crime perpetrated by businesses and government representatives. The first definition, by Edwin Sutherland, depicted it as a crime done by someone of high social status in the field of their profession.
Examples of white-collar crimes are wage fraud, bribery, theft, identity theft, and forgery.
