<u>The answer is 1: He thinks the fighting is foolish and wasteful.</u>
The narrator's view on the scene is not pleasant at all, Grendel finds himself in the middle of chaos, in the middle of all the battle's wastefulness and dead bodies of animals and men, and he can't help to see it as confusing and frightening and to feel "sick". All of this reveals that Grendel thinks the fighting is foolish and wasteful.
Answer:
I think the correct choice is the first one
Explanation:
A dictionary or safari and if it doesn't give you an answer it's giving you an idea
Answer: 1. <u>Man</u> has <em><u>created</u></em> many inventions; yet, teleportation has not been possible.
2. <u>Rich people</u> <u><em>waste</em></u> a lot of money; meanwhile, poor people barely have food for the day.
3. <u>I</u> haven't <em><u>done</u></em> my laundry, nor washed the dishes.
4. Sometimes, <u>singers</u> <em><u>release</u></em> bad music since they have pressure from the record.
5. <u>My boyfriend</u> <em><u>lost</u></em> his wallet, so I had to pay for the food.
Explanation:
Independent clauses are complete clauses that can stand on their own, but when they are next to coordinating conjunctions or conjunctive adverbs, they form a compound sentence. These five examples have two independent clauses. For instance: "Rich people waste a lot of money" and "poor people barely have food for the day" make sense on their own; however, the conjunctive adverb "meanwhile" connects and contrasts them.
Answer:If the story were told from John's perspective, it would be a much more detached view of the narrator's descent into madness. Although the readers do not know what John thinks, it is clear that he believes that the medical treatment is correct. Not only would his perspective add another dimension to the woman's madness, but it would make him a more sympathetic character and perhaps even make their love story more tragic.
Who does Gilman ultimately blame for the narrator's descent into madness? Why?
In some ways, Gilman can seem to blame both John and S. Weir Mitchell for the narrator's ultimate insanity. Although they both mean well, their decision to promote the "rest cure" treatment is certainly the catalyst for the narrator's mental break. However, at the same time, Gilman could blame the society of the time, a society that expected women to be perfect wives and mothers and nothing else.
What is the significance of the first-person perspective of the narrative?
The first-person perspective of the narrative is very important because it allows the reader to understand and experience the narrator's descent into madness on a personal level. Instead of discovering the narrator's insanity from the detached perspective of a third-person narrator, the reader is present in the narrator's head at every stage of her insanity. As a result, the story is much more powerful and ultimately more disconcerting.
Explanation: