The example of appeasement from WWII is that of Neville Chamberlain giving into the demands of Adolf Hitler and signing the Munich Pact.
<h3>What is the Appeasement?</h3>
In international relations, appeasement is defined as the diplomatic scheme of acquiring material, governmental, or territorial acquiescences to an offender in command to forbid the battle.
The Munich Pact, signed by Neville Chamberlain in response to Adolf Hitler's demands, is an example of appeasement during WWII.
Therefore, option C is correct.
Learn more about the appeasement, refer to:
brainly.com/question/11969058
#SPJ1
Your answer should be C.) The government set up by the Articles of Confederation was not effective. That's why they had to replace the Articles of Confederation with the Constitution.
Answer: B. a lower per capita income.
Explanation:
Per capita income refers to a measure of economic development that divides a nation's GDP by the population of the country. It is meant to show in theory, the amount of wealth that each person in the country has.
A developed country like the United States would have a very high GDP which when divided by the population of the U.S. would give a higher per capita income. This is unlike a developing country that would have a lower GDP and by extension, a lower per capita income as well.
Answer:
is that a cup, pen, rubber band all in a table
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
The anti-war movement is a movement of group or individual usually in opposition or against a particular country or government decision to start a war or being involved in an armed conflicts
The Major positive impact of anti-war movement is that
1) The movement work through protest or other available means either by matching or placard waving to make efforts in making the government to put an end to a particular war or conflicts. This is turn leads to avoidance of casualty which would or maybe recorded in the conflict or war.
2) it makes the government accountable to it citizens
3) it leads to curbing of resources wastage
Some of the negative impart of anti-war is
1) Such movement might be highjacked by the opposition there using the movement for personal ambition or motives which is contrary to the main motive the movement was formed.
2) The protest may leads to violence there causing harm to people and property.
