The best definition of technology is the study and transformation of techniques, tools, and machines created by humans. Technology allows humans to study and evolve the physical elements that are present in their lives.
<h3>Further explanation</h3>
We can study the technology of a car engine, the technology of television, and the technology of a job or art. Nature can not be considered as a technology because humans did not have any role in its creation. They can transform it on the surface, but not deeply. In this case, we call it a science.
Science is a theoretical knowledge that man seeks to master to understand the working and the link that exists between different natural phenomena. On the contrary, technology is practical knowledge that is alive. We study technology to improve the observed object. It is an activity that is always moving. On the contrary, science is frozen in time. The science of mathematics has not changed much in centuries. The concepts have remained the same. For example, the technology of a mobile phone did not exist 100 years ago. It is the engineers who invented it.
<h3>Learn more</h3>
- Recent advances in technology: brainly.com/question/1371515
- The purpose of a technology hub: brainly.com/question/11257143
- The undesirable effects of technology: brainly.com/question/12570326
<h3>Answer details</h3>
Subject: Social science
Chapter: Technology
Keywords: the definition of new technologies, the difference between science and technology, what are the kinds of technologies
Answer:
1.First, as a trained and experienced individual who displayed the desired leadership qualities during the Indian and French War, George Washington was the most logical choice at the time to lead the Continental Army. The Continental Congress was responsible for the formation of the army in 1755 at the onset of the American Revolution.
2.Washington was a man of faith and action
Our first president believed deeply in God’s providence and he demonstrated it with his actions. He was not one to give eloquent speeches and remove himself to a comfortable tent. He put his faith and his beliefs into action. A leader “walks the talk” and recognizes that true authority comes from God. Every leader is but a steward of power that rightfully belongs to God, and should act accordingly.
3.Washington treated those reporting to him with dignity and respect
Washington was against tyranny and he valued individual freedom. Therefore, he did not act like a tyrant and extended freedom to others. Washington had faith in his people. No matter what rank, Washington treated everyone with the same respect. God’s image is indelibly imprinted on all of us. Leaders, especially, should demonstrate this truth in all of their relationships. If God can give us free will, a leader can empower people and then give them the agency and support to do their best work.
Focusing on the inner workings of the First Crusade in a way that no other work has done, The First Crusade and the Idea of Crusading delves into the Crusade's organization, its finances, and the division of authority and responsibility among its leaders and their relationships with one another and with their subordinates.
In the year 1095, Pope Urban II initiated what is known today as the First Crusade. His summons of the lay knights to the faith between 1095 and 1096 was Urban II's personal response to an appeal that had reached him from eastern Christians, the Pope referred to the struggle ahead as Christ's own war, to be fought in accordance with God's will and intentions. It was, too, called a war of liberation, designed to free the church and city of Jerusalem from oppression and pillage by the Muslims while liberating western Church from the errors into which it had fallen.
In this classic work, presented here with a new introduction, one of the world's most renowned crusade historians approaches this central topic of medieval history with freshness and impeccable research. Through the vivid presentation of a wide range of European chronicles and charter collections, Jonathan Riley-Smith provides a striking illumination of crusader motives and responses and a thoughtful analysis of the mechanisms that made this expedition successful.
Answer: Grover Cleveland’s response to the Pullman strike was to send federal troops to keep the trains running.
Explanation:
The Pullman Strike started on 11 May 1894. It was the result of protest by railway workers against George Pullman, hence the name Pullman strike.
George Pullman started cutting manpower and asked the remaining ones to work extra hours at a lower wages. This started in 1983 as a result of economic downfall caused by the Panic of 1893.
It was this strike that gave birth to Labor Day, a national holiday to pacify American labor movement.
The labors who started Pullman Strike were from a union founded by Eugene Debs, known as American Railroad Union (ARU).
The government's response to this strike gave a hint that government is trying to break the strike.