Solve this system of equations.

English

2 answers:

trasher [3.6K]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

(-3, 0)

Explanation:

(Just wanted to give you a heads up that you posted this under the English category.)

We can solve this system by elimination. Let's multiply the first equation by two and keep the second equation the same to get the same first term:

4x + 12y = -12

4x - 3y = -12

We can now subtract the two equations to isolate the y term:

4x - 4x = 0

12y - (-3y) = 15y

-12 - (-12) = 0

We then get the equation: 15y = 0

Solve for y by diving both sides by 15; we get y = 0.

Now we can choose either equation in the system and plug in y, and then solve for x:

2x + 6(0) = -6

2x = -6

x = -3

Our answer is (-3, 0).

We can also check our answer by plugging it in the other equation:

4(-3) - 3(0) = -12

-12 - 0 = -12

Since this equation is true, our answer is correct and solves this system.

ArbitrLikvidat [17]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

-3,0

Explanation:

edge 2021 assingment for last lesson

You might be interested in

An anecdote, passage, or example is a type of what?

ss7ja [257]

Anecdotes, passages, or examples are given as evidence to support a point.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Margaret finds that calling all her senior supervisors and quality managers for a face-to-face meeting is not feasible. She arra

MatroZZZ [7]

Answer:

False.

Explanation:

The given assertion proffers a false claim as it incorrectly defines the communication displayed by Margaret through arranging a 'multiparty text chatting session with her quality managers and supervisors' as 'asynchronous communication'. <u>This situation rather exemplifies a 'synchronous communication' as they all have been invited to a single platform to discuss the things face-to-face in real-time without the use of any external signal</u>. All the participants are substantially involved in the process of communication. Therefore, the given statement is asserting a <u>false</u> definition.

4 0

3 years ago

In what way is the ESA “one of the

Anika [276]

Answer:

The ESA has done more good than harm because it has help to prevent total EXTINCTION and eradication of some plants and animals that might have been wiped out from there kingdom due to human use or environmental factors. Ihas also brought about recovery of palnts and animals that might have been lost

Explanation:

The ESA act has been so significant and useful to wild animals because it has prevented these animals from being wiped out or terminated from existing in the forest. It has serve as a cover law to makes this species live longer and not erased away due to environmental or human use for some purposes. The Act has also helped lots of animal and plants to come back to live due to some restrictions the law has brought in to control the extinction