Answer:
The decision of the Supreme Court affected the US citizens' right to freedom of speech.
Explanation:
Charles Schenck was the general secretary of the US Social Party. Socialists were against the world war that was occurring at the time since they believed that the US involvement only benefited the rich. The poor soldiers were the ones who were sent to fight. As a result, socialists also urged US workers to oppose the war. Schenck participated in many anti war activities and he mailed leaflets to soldiers trying to convince them of resisting the draft. As he violated the Espionage Act, because he caused insubordination in the military forces, he was convicted. However, after being tried, Schenck argued that his right to freedom of speech protected by the 1st Amendment of the US Constitution had been violated. The Espionage Act limited the freedom of speech in times of war. For the Court, Schenck's actions had put other people at risk. As a result, in wartime reasonable limits can be put the 1st Amendment's provision governing freedom of speech.
All of the above are relevant factors to be evaluated for moral intensity except
<u>Explanation:</u>
Moral intensity is the intensity of feeling that a person has about the values of a moral choice.
- The magnitude of the consequences: This is the quantity of the evils forced on the victims of the decision.
- Social consensus: This is the point of social recognition that an act is either moral or sinful.
- Proximity: This is the sense of intimacy, either culturally, psychologically, or bodily, that the soul has for the victims of the act in question.
- The concentration of effect: This is an inverse function of the number of characters hit by an act of any given measure.
Answer: Sammy Lee Lee
Explanation:
Pretty easy if you ask me, doesn't everybody know/knew that?
