Answer:
I don’t know the answer never been good with geography
Explanation:
Below are the differences between Bentham’s and Mill’s respective versions of utilitarianism:
1. The qualitative distinction
Bentham pots concede to any distinction in propensities yet
Mill arranged human inclinations and by ethical news of subjective contrast
called some honorable and another base. Along these lines, it is said that
scholarly propensities are far better than physiological inclinations.
2. Qualitative distinction in pleasures:
Similarly, Mill made subjective refinements in various joys. As indicated
by Bentham, all delights are comparable. In the event that the amount of joy is
the same, at that point, there is no distinction amongst verse and pushpin. As
opposed to this, as indicated by Mill, 'It is ideal to be a person disappointed
than a pig fulfilled, better to be a Socrates disappointed than a trick
fulfilled.
Answer: The woman took care of the family and the house.
Explanation:
When we talk about women's position in Athenian society, that position was not of significant historical importance. The community in Athens was patriarchal organized. The woman mostly spent time in the house, taking care of the children, and doing housework. That a woman did not have a significant influence in society is also shown by the fact that a woman, even if she was born an Athenian, did not have the right to make political decisions. Even at the time of the birth of Athenian democracy, women did not influence any decision-making, nor did they have the right to vote.
Answer:
It made foreign nations more likely to ally with the US
Explanation:
The foreign aid that was sent by the administration of John Kennedy to Latin America had the purpose of making the countries in this region allies of the United States. The principle at how the aid was expected to work was that the people and governments of these countries would be grateful to the United States and see them as a friend that tries to help them and develop them. While the idea was good for the United States, in practice it was not going as planned. Most of the Latin American countries had much more affinity toward the communism and socialism, which was something that the United States was actually fighting against, and unfortunately that led to numerous conflicts in this regions, most of which sponsored by the United States themselves.
