ZABD and ZDBC are supplementary angles.
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Answer:
Oook, quick setup: pick a cartesian plane, be the position of the helicopter as time passes, and
your position as you start running. In my horrible sketch, the green line is the distance when you start running, the red line is the distance you need, in general what you want is to move one end of the segment up, the other right, and stretch it.
That distance is easily found with the formula for the distance between two points in the plane, or (playing a bit with the squares). At this point we need to write down expressions for both
and find at what value of t we need to evaluate our distance.
For the sake of semplicity, let's start measuring times the moment you start running. Since speed is constant, both expressions will be of the form
The equation for the runner becomes simply , since you haven't moved until the heli is high enough.
The equation of the helicopter is since the heli is 30ft above ground when you start running.
Finally, we need to know how many seconds have passed when the heli is at 60 ft above ground. that happens when . in this time, you are at
from the origin.
Plugging it in the distance formula you get:
Answer:
0.01 probability of a car rolling over in a crash.
It is very unlikely for a car to roll over in a crash.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let E be any event.
Then, the probability of happening of an event E =
Now here,
Let E1 = The event where cars rolled when they crashed
E2 = The event where cars did not roll when they crashed
The number of cars that did roll = 83, 600
The number of cars that did not roll = 5,127,400
So, total number of cars taken into account for any event
= 83, 600 + 5,127,400 = 5,211,000
So, P(E1) = 83, 600 / 5,211,000 = 0.01
Hence there is 0.01 probability of a car rolling over in a crash.
and P(E2) = 5,127,400 / 5,211,000 = 0.98
Since P(E2) is way way more than that of P(E1)
Hence, it is very unlikely for a car to roll over in a crash.