Answer: I and III
Step-by-step explanation:
We observe in the case provided that the researcher, who has no interest in the population to intervene, is going to carry out surveys to assess whether the neighborhood is a good place to live, obtaining the following conclusions:
i. The Minneapolis Resident Survey was an observational study.
ii. The Minneapolis Resident Survey was an experiment.
iii. The figure 50.1% is a descriptive statistic for the sample.
iv. The figure 50.1% is a statistical inference for the population.:By estimating the sample, obtained by a lower percentage of the total of the respondents, it is known that with a 95% confidence interval that the rating obtained from the respondents considering that the neighborhood is a good place to live was found between 0.44 and 0.50, taking this interval as a statistical inference for the population.
The correct answer is I and III, since in this study no interventions were made to the population and only one observation of a characteristic of the neighborhood was made and in III we know that the descriptive statistic only describes data and summarizes it, which is a of the ways to display the data from the descriptive survey.
Answer:
Number of additional inches= x
Number of additional topping= y
Total cost= 8+1.5(x)+0.75(y)
- cost of pizza= 8+1.5x+0.75y
<u>-----------------------</u>
<u>hope it helps...</u>
<u>have a great day!!</u>
This is already in scientific notation
17)
x² + 8 = -8
x² = -8 - 8
x² = 16
x = ±√-16
x = ±√16i
x = <span>±4i
</span>
18)
x² + 5 = -3
x² = -3 - 5
x² = -8
x = ±√-8
x = ±√8i
x = ±2√2i
19)
x² + 3 = 0
x² = -3
x = ±√-3
x = <span>±</span>√3i
hope this helps, God bless!
The pyramid has a greater volume.
The volume of the cone is 1436.7 ( to 5 sf )
The volume of the pyramid is 1437.3 ( to 5 sf )
Both of them is 1440 when rounded off to 3 sf. However , the volume of the pyramid is greater.
( so sorry I can’t explain well but I hope it helps )
The solution is in the picture:) hope you understand better!! Sorry if It’s confusing
