A gerund that comes after an action verb is being used as a A.Direct object B. Predicate nominative

English

1 answer:

Slav-nsk [51]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

A gerund that comes after an action verb is being used as A. direct object.

Explanation:

Let's use examples to better visualize the difference:

1. She enjoys dancing.

2. Her favorite thing is dancing.

In sentence 1, the gerund "dancing" follows the action verb "enjoys". Here, what we have is a direct object. The gerund completes the action described by the verb, answering the question "what". What does she enjoy? Dancing. Thus, "dancing" receives the action of being enjoyed.

In sentence 2, on the other hand, the gerund "dancing" follows a linking verb, "is". Linking verbs do not express an action. Their purpose is to connect the subject to its predicate. In this case, the gerund is not a direct object. It is a predicate nominative, and it modifies the subject.

You might be interested in

How does the focus of the poem “Birmingham Sunday” by Richard Fariña differ from the focus of the poem “Ballad of Birmingham” by

-Dominant- [34]

“Birmingham Sunday” discusses the deaths of all four girls, while “Ballad of Birmingham” focuses on the death of one girl.

In "Birmingham Sunday" Richard Farina uses verses 2-5 to identify the name of each of the four girls, giving them their own verse in the song. In "Ballad of Birmingham" the mother refuses to let her child go down to the protests happening in the streets for fear of the violence. She sends her child to church instead. The church, however, is bombed and the daughter dies.

7 0

3 years ago

Choose the best word to complete the analogy. fish : school :: bee :

kiruha [24]

The answer is colony

4 0

3 years ago

5 EASY ENGLISH HELP!!!

Cloud [144]

1. metaphor
2.personification
3.alliteration
4.hyperbole
5.personification

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Giving brainliest to CORRECT answer thxxxx

AnnZ [28]

Answer:

Explanation:

B is the right answer

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Discuss weather king uses valid reasoning when he states that "injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere". What evide

Murrr4er [49]

In his "Letter from Birmingham Jail," King argues that "injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." The evidence he employs is that of racially discriminatory laws in the South. King argues that the existence of unjust laws such as segregation represent an injustice. And this unjustice is an obstacle for achieving equality and justice everywhere in the country. For example, if white people do not believe in segregation, this nonetheless means that they have to abide by the law, causing injustice. The appeal that he uses is logos, as he encourages us to think of the logic of the arguments put forward by lawmakers.

4 0

3 years ago