It gave them real life details to work with.
The main reason that would make a country to end its participation in a war because it has become immoral is the presence of war crimes.
<h3>What are War Crimes?</h3>
This refers to the inhumane actions that a person or soldier, usually fighting in a foreign country metes out on people, such as unprovoked aggression, extra-judicial killings, genocide, etc
Hence, we can see that the presence of war crimes is the main reason why a country would pull out of a war and claims it is immoral as this would have infringed on human rights.
Read more about war crimes here:
brainly.com/question/1550237
#SPJ1
The interest group that voiced opinions on ratifying the constitution and establishing a more powerful central government was known as the Federalists and Anti-Federalists.
<h3>Who are the Federalists and Anti-Federalists?</h3>
A conflict arose over ratification, with the Federalists supporting a strong union and the Constitution's adoption and the Anti-Federalists opposing the establishment of a powerful national government and rejecting ratification.
In contrast to the Anti-Federalists, who opposed the ratification of the U.S. Constitution in 1787, the Federalists stood for those who favored the establishment of a more powerful federal government.
Because they believed that state constitutions already protected individual rights, the Anti-Federalists opposed a bill of rights in the Constitution.
In exchange for their approval, the Federalists agreed to include the Bill of Rights.
To ensure that the rights would not be revoked by the new federal government, the Anti-Federalists insisted that a bill of rights be included in the Constitution.
To learn more about Anti-Federalists, visit:
brainly.com/question/28622723
#SPJ1
They follow strategies for resource management.
They distribute forest use benefits fairly.
The protect habitats.
I hope this helps!
Answer: C
Oversimplifications often ignore complex or contradictory evidence. Explanation: Historians should avoid over simplification as such because it often ignores complex or contradictory evidence. Historians are saddled with the responsibility of trying to understand and decipher the past in order to predict the future.
Explanation: very well explained??
