1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oksanka [162]
3 years ago
5

Who else thinks LG deserves to be alot more popular? COMMENT

History
2 answers:
aliya0001 [1]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

NO

Explanation:

Ivenika [448]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

android>ios always

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What are the positives and negatives of having political parties in the United States?
Diano4ka-milaya [45]

Answer:

1. Political parties can be abusive.

Not every government is a representative form of government. Communism has political parties. Dictatorships often use political parties. The purpose of the parties in these instances is usually more about enforcement of laws and expectations instead of being politically active from an individualized perspective. If a political party has too much strength or leverage within a society, it can become abusive.

1. Political parties encourage public participation.

Political parties, when structured within a representative form of government, encourage the average person to be politically active. They ask for people to become informed about specific situations that are happening within society so they can take a stand on those issues. Debates allow for people to express opinions or share ideas to formulate an informed opinion. Many political parties will even encourage members to run for political office at all levels of government.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain why the supersonic transport built by england and france was named the concorde
shtirl [24]

Concorde is French for 'agreement', and this was chosen to signify the agreement and co-operation between Britain and France in developing the plane.

7 0
3 years ago
How are the boundaries drawn during the Berlin Conference to blame for the political unrest in modern Africa?
Alik [6]

Answer:

The Berlin Conference can be best understood as the formalisation of the Scramble for Africa. This British coined the term sometime in 1884, and it has since been used to describe the twenty-plus years when the various European powers explored, divided, conquered and began to exploit virtually the entire African continent. European powers were slow to realise the benefits of claiming land in Africa and had mainly kept to coastal colonies. However in 1884–5 the Scramble for Africa had truly began in earnest when thirteen European countries and the United States met in Berlin to agree to the rules dividing Africa. The outcome of the conference was the General Act of the Berlin Conference.

Prior to the conference, European diplomacy treated African indigenous people in the same manner as they treated New World natives, forming trade realtions with tribal chiefs. This can seen in examples such as the Portuguese trading with the Kingdom of the Kongo. With the exception of the trading posts along the coasts, the continent was essentially ignored. This changed as a result of King Leopold of Belgium’s desire for personal glory and riches and by the mid-19th century, Africa was considered ripe for exploration, trade, and settlement. 

In 1876, Belgium’s King Leopold II announced his intent to fund an exploration of the Congo region, and in 1879 Leopold sent Sir Henry Morton Stanley to the area. In the same year, the French began building a railway east from Dakar, hoping to tap potentially huge Sahelian markets. That year France also joined Great Britain in taking financial control of Egypt.

From 1879 to 1885, Stanley went to the Congo as an envoy from Léopold with the secret mission to organise what would become known as the Congo Free State, a mercantile enterprise in the Congo. French intelligence had discovered Leopold’s plans, and France was quick to engage in its own colonial exploration. French naval officer Pierre de Brazza was dispatched to central Africa, traveled into the western Congo basin, and raised the French flag over the newly founded Brazzaville in 1881, in what is currently the Republic of Congo. To add to this, Portugal, had a long history in the are through its trade and treaties with the Kongo Empire in the area through its treaties with the Kongo Empire which in essence became a proxy state of Portugal. It quickly made a treaty with its old ally, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, on 26 February 1884 to block off the Congo Society’s access to the Atlantic.

By the early 1880s European interest in Africa had increased dramatically. Stanley’s charting of the Congo River Basin (1874–77) removed the last bit of terra incognita from European maps of the continent, thereby delineating the rough areas of British, Portuguese, French, and Belgian control. The powers raced to push these rough boundaries to their furthest limits and eliminating any local minor rulers which might prove troublesome to European competitive diplomacy.

France moved to occupy Tunisia, one of the last of the Barbary Pirate states, under the pretext of another Islamic terror and piracy incident. French claims by Pierre de Brazza were quickly solidified with the French taking control of today’s Republic of the Congo in 1881 and also Guinea in 1884. This, in turn, partly convinced Italy to become part of the Triple Alliance, thereby upsetting Germany's Otto van Bismarck’s carefully laid out plans with Italy and forcing Germany to become involved. In 1882, realizing the geopolitical extent of Portuguese control on the coasts, but seeing penetration by France eastward across Central Africa toward Ethiopia, the Nile, and the Suez Canal, Britain saw its vital trade route through Egypt and its Indian Empire threatened.

for more brief explanation please go tohttps://www.sahistory.org.za/article/berlin-conference

4 0
3 years ago
The United States blank gives the government its power on behalf of people
Pavel [41]
It's constitution lol
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the most significant reason for the fall of the Byzantine Empire? and which cause had the greatest impact? EXPLAIN your
laiz [17]

Answer:

Civil wars. Probably the most important single cause of Byzantium's collapse was its recurrent debilitating civil wars. Three of the worst periods of civil war and internal infighting took place during Byzantium's decline.

Explanation:

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The term cottage industries was used to refer to
    10·1 answer
  • Using what you’ve learned, describe the effect of communications technology on globalization. Be sure to mention how communicati
    15·2 answers
  • Which group feared that freed slaves would take its jobs at lower wages? 1) Abolitionist. 2) Northern laborers. 3) Union soldier
    6·2 answers
  • After the fall of the Soviet Union, Cuba lost its subsidies but remained a __________ nation.
    15·1 answer
  • This law states that the "Chinese laborers to this country endanger the good order of certain localities" in the United States.
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the significance of Susan B. Anthony's
    6·1 answer
  • 1. How did the Industrial revolution affect the economy ?
    15·1 answer
  • 2 Points
    13·1 answer
  • Question 10 of 10
    10·1 answer
  • Which action contributed to the southern belief that their economy was theatened
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!