1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
cupoosta [38]
3 years ago
9

Why were the Native Americans so important in the clash between the French and British? Who had the advantage with the Native Am

ericans and why?
History
1 answer:
irga5000 [103]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Native Americans were excellent warriors and accustomed to fighting in the woods of North America. The French had the advantage. Unlike the British, the French were more interested in trading furs than taking over the Native Americans' land.

You might be interested in
After the Fourth Crusade, support among Europeans for the Crusades ?
Readme [11.4K]

Answer:

(B),(2) began to decline.

Explanation:

After the Fourth Crusade, support among Europeans for the Crusades

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The fear of foreigners during the 1920s was part of the return to
Anna [14]

The fear of foreigners during the 1920s was part of the return to  normalcy

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why would california workers be against japanese immigration?
zloy xaker [14]
<span>(If it was in this time January 24, 1848 – 1855) it's </span>Cause when there is more people looking for gold, there will be less gold to get.
But if not in 1848 – 1855, it cause <span> immigration laws were passed restricting immigration from Asia, the reasons are the same as the fears of Mexican immigrants now-that they would take jobs and provide an inexpensive workforce that would keep wages low. There were also fears that they wanted to take over land on the west coast. It was called the "yellow peril" and evidence of how people give in to irrational fears.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
In what ways do you think that nationalist attitudes and feelings might promote peaceful interactions towards a common objective
Scilla [17]

Answer:

Nationalism, like nation, is very hard to define clearly and unequivocally. The contention that nationalism is what nationalists make of it is, in fact, an evasion.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
"After a bill is introduced in the Legislative branch, the bill
yKpoI14uk [10]

Goes through the House of Representatives and the Senate

6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What political group was founded by nativists in 1849?
    9·2 answers
  • Which spanish explorer passed through the texas panhandle in search of gold
    12·1 answer
  • During which US presidency did the nuclear arms race begin
    9·1 answer
  • What is one way in which the israeli-palestinian conflict affected lebanon?
    6·2 answers
  • How did the shogun gain power in japan
    11·1 answer
  • Support for the Bolsheviks grew during 1917 because the provisional government did not
    15·1 answer
  • 2. Based on the map, identify the following states as Roman Catholic, Greek/Eastern Orthodox, or Islamic.
    10·1 answer
  • Describe two features of The Cold War in detail.
    14·2 answers
  • What 4 aspects did Japan adopt from Korea?
    15·2 answers
  • What is the era towards the end of the nineteenth century, characterized by great transformation, commonly called today?.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!