Basic argument of the Federalists for ratification <span>of the constitution is that it would give the central government more powers which was essential for the survival of the United States. A stronger central government would improve the economy, foreign relations, and would give the government more power to levy taxes and execute laws, as well as the power to create a strong military without permission from the states.
Arguments against the ratification would be used by ANTI-Federalists, NOT Federalists.
Those arguments against ratification were that the central government would get too powerful and strip the average citizens of their rights. Other problems that were brought forth were the states' representation in the government. Eventually, the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution and the anti-Federalists were less apposed to it.
</span><span>
</span>
Answer:
Corpus Juris Civilis
Explanation:
The Corpus Juris Civilis, drawn up under the strict supervision of king justinian, was a milestone of Roman case law. Corpus Juris Civilis is indeed a magnificent artifact to something like a remarkable period of legislative system.
This scheme aims at clarifying and upgrading the older roman rules, removing contradictions and speeding up legal procedures, gathering royal decrees including expert advice on all sorts of matters, including penalties for particular marital offences and succession.
Answer:
Because runaway slaves could not expect any help until they got to a free state, it was more difficult for slaves in the Deep South like Alabama and Louisiana to make it to freedom.
Explanation:
