1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IrinaVladis [17]
4 years ago
14

Can someone please help me with this! I will award brainliest for the best and correct answer!!

Mathematics
1 answer:
iogann1982 [59]4 years ago
6 0
88% of Clarissa's pay was from her commissions. 
You might be interested in
At one of my first jobs, I made $5 per hour. Make a prediction about how much I would have made if I worked for 32 hours in week
enot [183]
If you worked 32 hours in a week u would have 160.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Proportional relationships, please answer all of the parts! Thank you!
Natalka [10]

Answer:

a. No (see below)

b. (see below)

c. Johnny

d. Johnny = $12.50 / hour      Doug = $9.16... / hour

e. Doug: extend the table to show how much he gets paid for 1 hour of work (the unit rate)

Johnny: already on the graph

Step-by-step explanation:

a. No. This is because a proportional relationship would have a certain ratio between payment and the amount of time spent working, which would not change. However, if Doug's neighbour pays him $55 for 6 hours, it's likely that this is not a proportional relationship, or we would be able to divide $55 by the 6 hours Doug spent working.

b. Even though above I said that it's probably not a proportional relationship, if it were, we would have to divide everything equally. I'm guessing the table should look like this:

                            Doug

       Time (hr)                      Earnings ($)

          4                                  $36.66...

          5                                  $45.8333...

          6                                  $55

          7                                  $64.4666....

          8                                  $73.333...

To work out how much Doug would get for working 4 hours:

4/6 x $55 = 2/3 x $55 = $36.66... (so definitely not a proportional relationship)

To work out how much Doug would get for working 5 hours:

5/6 x $55 = $45.8333.... (more evidence that this is not a proportional relationship)

To work out how much Doug would get for working 7 hours (we already got 6 hours):

7/6 x $55 = $64.4666...

To work out how much Doug would get for working 8 hours:

8/6 x $55 = $73.33... (we could double the 4 hour payment, but this is probably more accurate)

c. Johnny is getting paid more. If we look at how much Doug gets for 6 hours, it's $55. If we look out at how much Johnny gets for 6 hours, it's $75. (If we do the same with the other amounts of time, it's the same.

4 hours: D = $36.67 vs J = $50

5 hours: D = $45.83 VS J = $60

etc...

d. Johnny gets $75 per 6 hours --> 75/6 = $12.50 per hour

Doug gets $55 per 6 hours --> 55/6 = $9.1666... per hour

e. Carry on the table for Doug all the way to 1, so you can see the how much Doug gets paid for 1 hour of work (i.e. the minimum).

The unit rate is already on the graph for Johnny.

HOPE THIS HELPED :)

P.S. Mate cld you please give me Brainliest? That table took so much dam work

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hellen used a coupon she received in the mail at a local boutique that decreased her purchase of $85.20 by $12.78. Her sister us
Over [174]

Answer:

y = 12665 (100⁻¹)  + b

Step-by-step explanation:

To model this relationship, you're to write the equation of a line; in the form

y = mx + b

Now let y represent the full coupon value,

mx represent the amount spent by Hellen and her sister

and b, the change that's left on the coupon.

So, the summary of Hellen's transaction is:

$85.2 became $(85.2 - 12.78) which is  =  $72.42

The summary of her sister's transaction is:

$63.8 became $(63.8 - 9.57) which is  =  $54.23

So   y - (72.42 + 54.23) = b

y - 126.65 = b

y = 126.65 + b

Separating m from x in mx, you have

y = 12665 x 1/100  + b

y = 12665 (100⁻¹)  + b

Where m = 12,665   and x = 100⁻¹

3 0
3 years ago
The figures are similar. Find the missing length. Round to the nearest thousandth. (Hint: this is actually a reduction, the shap
Elena-2011 [213]

Answer:

x = 3.125 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

\frac{5}{x}=\frac{8}{5} \\8x = 25\\x = \frac{25}{8}=3.125

3 0
3 years ago
A ball has a diameter of 12 inches.what is the volume of the ball
sleet_krkn [62]

Answer:

288π

I hope this helps!

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The total cost of attending community college is 4800 for the first .A students parents will pay half of this cost and a band sc
    5·1 answer
  • How do you find the hypotenuse of a triangle?
    15·1 answer
  • Urgent !! please help !! can someone help me with this problem and show work
    11·2 answers
  • How much would it cost to fence in this property if fencing costs $5.00 per foot?
    11·1 answer
  • An endangered whale species has a population of 6000. Biologists estimate that the stock is decreasing at 3% per year. At this r
    9·1 answer
  • The sail and mast of a sailboat form a right triangle.What is the height of the mast on the sailboat? height 20m width 12m
    5·1 answer
  • On Saturday and Sunday jarrod went running and burned a total of 6475 calories he burned 320 of those calories on Saturday which
    13·1 answer
  • Please help me out:(
    15·1 answer
  • a town had 2120 acres of pine trees a few years ago. only 15% of the acres of trees are left. how many acres of pine trees remai
    8·1 answer
  • You’ve analyzed each game. Which game earns you more points?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!