Answer:
Tendency to engage in charity is strongest for religious individuals were religious behavior is a matter of personal choice.
Explanation:
A religious individual
This is often refered to as someone who tries in every possible way to live his or her life in accordance with his or her faith. Those who regularly engages in religious activities is termed "religious".
Religion
This is often known as an organized and collective belief or faith system.
Intrinsic religiosity
This kind of religiosity deals with the fact that it is an individual's primary motive in life and it is the driving force in their life while Extrinsic religiosity is religiosity motivated by external, non-religious rewards.
Helping is the act of rendering assistance to fellow human being especially those of the same faith.
Religion is not enforced but mostly a matter of personal choice. One can decide to be in it or not. Religious people most times are actively involved in charity so as to render help,draw people to their faith or make the world a better place.
Answer:
<h3>The invention of gunpowder.</h3>
Explanation:
- The post classical era often called as post ancient period is the period between 6th century AD to 15th century AD. This period is also known as the medieval period and is known for the various discoveries and inventions made during this age.
- It was during the post classical era China invented the four greatest inventions of all time. They were the gunpowder, printing press, paper and compass.
- The invention of gunpowder changed the whole scenario of warfare. It had a very powerful impact on the ways of battles and warfare all over the world.
Answer:The descriptions below are from The IR Theory Web Site created by Mark Beavis of ... A balance of power system functions most effectively when alliances are fluid, when ... Defensive realism holds that the international system provides incentives for ... structural change in world politics, in the past millennium in particular
Explanation:
Critical thinking could be used in this example to actively engage with the proposition and propose an alternative or another proposition. Maybe in my own life experience I've known women who drive better than man, so I already have first hand example of how this is a misbelieve, but in order to prove this i have to go a step further.
---
Skepticism should refrain us from making statement from things we don't know yet. The proposition is a generality and thus already tell us that is a prejudice, but moreover when we are talking about things without having knowledge is a good scientific practise to step back and know the argument before speaking.
---
Objectivity is what we should aim when examine datas and proposition. Once we have the data, we could objectevely tell if this proposition respects the truth or not. Some importance should also be given to the motivation and the qualitative data, and not only the raw quantitative data, as reading and analyse only one type could lead to more misunderstading.
---
Curiosity is what we should always bring to the table in everyday matter. In the proposition, we could step back and ask why this is a well consolidates rumour, or why are the reasons behind this saying. Curiosity should be the driven to explain the world in a more complex and rich way comparing to the way other people may live.
---
Other examples of proposition that could be examine by the scientific approach are almost endless. "Women are not good at STEM fields" for example, or "Men generally are more qualified leaders". It is possible to argue that every proposition could be examine in a scientific approach, and maybe we all should do it so.
