The correct answer is D. School uniforms should not be required because they reduce individual expression.
Explanation:
A claim should always express the position of the author towards the issue being discussed, besides this, effective claims do not only express if the author agrees or disagrees but the reason or reasons for this. Additionally, claims should be debatable which means they need to be proven.
According to this "School uniforms should not be required because they reduce individual expression" is the best example of an effective claim because it shows the author opposes school uniforms, the reason for this "they reduce individual expression" and it is debatable.
My school has an OK environment. Some students with disabilities have a hard time getting around. One time I have a broken leg and we only have one elevator in the entire school in the elevator was on the completely other side of where my class was so it took forever to get downstairs
For example in New Zealand you can't vote if you're under 18 or in prison
In the UK you can't vote if your certified mad
I'm not so sure about the US but it may have some of these rules.
Hope it helps a bit!
Answer:
Greasers - 1. The public tends to forgive the wrongdoings of the Socs while Greasers are considered "hoodlums." 2. They come from the poorer East Side.
Both - 1. Socs and Greasers are negatively impacted by the stereotyping and conflict that surrounds their two groups
Socs - 1. They experience serious issues regarding self-esteem, grief and depression
Explanation:
Hope this helps dude
