Traditionally, the process of independence of Texas has been described as a completely noble struggle to defend and uphold the ideals of democracy, freedom, etc. However, little has been said as of the far more innoble motivations behind many individuals who settled down in Texas with the permission of the Mexican government. As became Mexico in 1821, its democratic government had agreed to allow immigrant from the U.S. to claim large plots of lands where they and their families could make a dignified living as ranchers or farmers, <u>but many of these immigrants had no intention to roll up their shirt sleeves, get their hands dirty and earn their everyday bread with the sweat on their foreheads: they speculated on real state from the very beginning, breaking the law in the process by claiming more lands than allowed</u>.
It is true that the government in Mexico took a bad turn for dictatorship in 1835, which prompted a number of states such as Zacatecas, Yucatan, Texas, etc. to secede from the country. However, a great number of Texans at the time speculated about the potential advantages of joining the U.S. Against the deal that every immigrant accepted into Texas had made with Mexico, as of not joining the U.S., Texans sent a delegation to the U.S. requesting for assistance. Later on, after the battles at El Alamo and San Jacinto in 1836, the Texan revolutionaries, who had captured president of Mexico and chief commander of the Mexican Army, Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna, the Treaties of Velasco signed by Sam Houston, Texans' leader and Santa Anna, recognized the independence of Mexico, even though the Mexican congress never ratified it.
<span>C. France was allied with Russia. This is true regarding the European alliances in the years before World War I.</span>
Answer:
One similarity between Charlemagne and Geoffrey Chaucer is that they were both the “Father” of something
Answer:
Correct answer is C. It made it clear that people living in U.S. territories had the same rights as people living in established states.
Explanation:
Option A is not correct as although slavery was prohibited in this Northwestern territories, that didn't meant that some new territories that were to enter United States had to prohibit slavery.
Option B is also not correct as states in these area were created a couple of years after the Ordinance was declared.
Option C is correct as the document stress out that all states would be equal in their rights.
Option D is not correct as the Ordinance has a bad effect on the Natives.