1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ivahew [28]
3 years ago
6

Passage: The black Hand

History
1 answer:
FrozenT [24]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

1.false

2.They wanted to unite the Serbs in an independent country.

3.They asked for a mediator. I think

You might be interested in
How was the Declaration of Independence viewed when it was first written?
ad-work [718]

The Declaration of Independence was written in 1776 by the Continental Congress. It was viewed as a document of the people wanting to Declare their independence from Britain. After all the taxes/laws the colonists have gone through, they had enough (Stamp Act, Sugar Act, Townshend Act, Intolerable Acts, etc.) Almost all colonists viewed it as their ray of "hope." There are a few loyalists who disapprove, though.

4 0
3 years ago
I need help
zhuklara [117]

Answer:

.

Explanation:

.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help brainiest
shutvik [7]

Answer:

Option 1

Reason:

It is praising the british soldiers for what they did.

Pls mark as brainliest

5 0
3 years ago
why are the decisions in miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and mapp v. Ohio stilwhyl very important to defendants in cri
Hunter-Best [27]

Answer:

The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.

Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.

For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.

Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.

8 0
3 years ago
The devastation of the Great Depression was confined to the United States.<br><br> True<br> False
sattari [20]
That is true my friend 

I hope this helps
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Kyoto Protocol is an agreement _____.
    13·1 answer
  • Where did the Oregon Trail or Santa Fe Trail take people?
    15·2 answers
  • Who had orders to take away the weapons of the Massachusetts militia? a. George Washington c. Thomas Gage b. William Dawes d. Pa
    14·2 answers
  • What actions by Britain caused the united states to impose economic sanctions against them?
    11·1 answer
  • One effect of the Dawes act was that it
    9·1 answer
  • Which of these historians was one of the first to emphasize documented facts over unverifiable stories
    13·2 answers
  • How did Pontius Pilate violate the religious beliefs of the Jews in Rome?
    6·2 answers
  • Which statement is true of native Americans in the late 1700s and early 1800s​
    10·2 answers
  • What are two ways that Africans were discriminated against by the white government?
    5·1 answer
  • Write one or two paragraphs identifying the factors that can influence human development. Describe at least four different facto
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!