The question that states that one of your colleagues constantly complains about everything at work and criticize the leadership and gossip about fellow-coworkers can be resolved by:
According to the given question, it is important to note that the colleague is:
This colleague simply does not want to work and would not let others to work because she is constantly complaining and making unnecessary criticisms.
The best way to resolve this situation is to dialogue and find a common ground. However, if this does not prove to be effective, then more drastic measure should be taken.
Read more about conflict resolution here:
brainly.com/question/20433645
Answer:
Taking over the Kingdom and the Queen
Explanation:
King Claudius addresses the court as the new king, informing how he, in the time of deep sorrow over the death of his brother, 'fought discretion with nature' to continue with the affairs of the state since it was monumental loss, yet the state must have a king. Taking the welfare of the 'warlike' state into account, Claudius marries his brother's wife, 'the imperial jointress' and hence he says he has done a right thing. Though he calls it 'a defeated joy' with a dropping eye, he usurps the kingdom very smartly. Claudius is quick in marrying his brother's wife since both 'funeral' and 'marriage' go simultaneously. Claudius's hurry in marriage is a scheme in taking the queen to his side in order to isolate Hamlet, the rightful heir and to prove to the world how much he cares about the kingdom and his dead brother.
Answer:
Habitat Disruption is when there is an interruption in the natural flow of a habitat. Habitat destruction is when the habitat has been damaged or destroyed and the species in that area can no longer sustain themselves there.
Explanation:
Examples:
Habitat disruption:
When an invasive species invade a habitat but the other species in the habitat learn to adapt.
Habitat Destruction:
When something, such as a forest fire, burns down a forest and the different species can no longer live in it.
Answer:
read it and u will get the write answer.... read
Let's write complete sentences using the given words:
1. Van Gogh's paintings are almost as expensive as the work of Picasso.
2. We did not know the Recycled Orchestra until we watched the video online yesterday.
For the first sentence, we can see that the purpose is to compare the work of two painters, Van Gogh and Picasso. That is why we use the structure "as ... as". We must place the adjective "expensive" in the middle: "almost as expensive as".
For the second sentence, we do not need to add anything. However, because of the word "yesterday", we know the sentence refers to something that happened in the past. Thus, we use the Simple Past tense for the verbs: not know - did not know; watch - watched.
In conclusion, all we need to do is read the words to grasp what the purpose of each sentence is and then add or change whatever is necessary to form a complete sentence.
Learn more about the Simple Past tense here:
brainly.com/question/14025107?referrer=searchResults
