remy said the table shows a proportional relationship because each distanc went up by 6ftg. Collin said that it was not a propor
tional relationship because there was no constant of proportionality there was not a single nymber that he could multiply the time by to get the distance
1 answer:
You might be interested in
<em>Greetings from Brasil...</em>
Here is the graphical explanation in the annex.
A = (-2; 4)
A' = (-2 - 4; 4 - 2) = (-6; 1)
After reflection on F(X)
<h2>A'' = (-1; 6) </h2>