remy said the table shows a proportional relationship because each distanc went up by 6ftg. Collin said that it was not a propor
tional relationship because there was no constant of proportionality there was not a single nymber that he could multiply the time by to get the distance
1 answer:
You might be interested in
If is the inverse of
, then by definition of inverse functions,
Given , the inverse, if its exists, satisfies the equation above. Evaluate
at the inverse, we have
Solve for the inverse:
Given , we do the same thing as before to find its inverse.
Answer:
3 left; 1 down
Step-by-step explanation:
You can determine the translation by identifying corresponding points on the two figures and counting the grid squares between them.
__
Here Q is a translation of P by 3 squares to the left and 1 square down.
