Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
1. The arguments for appointing judges for life terms is that "it gives job security, therefore enabling the appointed judges serve according to the rules of the land without being influence by the executive or legislative power out of worry that their appointment may be terminated at any given time if a decision is made against the executive wish.
2. The arguments against appointing judges for life terms is that some judges might serve with great impunity, knowing fully well that nobody is going to sack them again based on making decisions on crucial judgments, whether they serve in a right manner and according to the Constitution of the land or not.
It could be argued that until the United States is self-sufficient in oil production, international events can lead to "<span>Higher global demand [that] creates increase in price at the pump," since these events can often lead to a reduction in oil output. </span>
My day could've been better. i have a slight headache today the same as i did yesterday but it could've been worse? haha i hope your day is better than mine!
Answer: The union blockaded the port in Savannah so that the south could not get any help or supplies from other countries.
Explanation: Hope This Helps, :)
The correct answer is B.
The Schenk case dealt with Schenk encouraging people to avoid the military draft during World War I. He was arrested but argued that his first amendment freedom of speech was violated. After making its way through state and local courts, the case made it all the way to the Supreme Court. However, the court ruled it was NOT protected by the first amendment right of freedom of speech. This is because it caused a clear danger to the US war effort, which could cause the US to lose World War I.