Answer:
A) Recognize the write-down as a separate line item.
Explanation:
IAS 2 Accounting for Inventory requires that inventory be recognized at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Inventory is a balance sheet item which is initially recognized at cost.
However, once there is an indication that the cost is lower than the net realizable value, the carrying amount of inventory is written down with the write off recognized as a separate line in the P/l and not as an addition to the cost of goods sold.
Hence the right option is A) Recognize the write-down as a separate line item.
Available Options Are:
a. Increasing ROIC by increasing return on sales
b. Decreasing ROIC by increasing return on sales
c. Decreasing ROIC by decreasing return on sales
d. Increasing ROIC by decreasing return on sales
Answer:
Option C. Decreasing ROIC by decreasing return on sales
Explanation:
The return on sales would be reduced as the research expenses have increased substantially. The implications of increased research expenses on the ROIC can be understood by analyzing the ROIC formula which is given as under:
ROCI = Operating Income (1 - Tax Rate) / Book Value of Invested Capital
As revenue expenditure (Research and Development expenses) of the company has increased, this would decrease the operating income of the company which means that the numerator would be decreased and as a result the ROIC would decrease.
Answer:
What does the IRR rule say about whether you should accept this opportunity?
The IRR rule basically states that if the project's internal rate of return (IRR) is higher than the cost of capital (discount rate or WACC), then the project should be accepted. In this case, we are not given the company's WACC or any discount rate we can use, therefore there is nothing to compare the project's IRR against.
Based on prior experience, this project's IRR will not be very high and if we consider the cost of keeping the site clean forever, I really doubt that the project is profitable. If you calculate the project's IRR without including the perpetual cleaning cost, IRR = 11%.
If we assume any of the 3 WACCs I used as an example below, the project's IRR including cleaning costs:
- if WACC = 12%, then IRR = 9.26% REJECTED
- if WACC = 10%, then IRR = 8.98% REJECTED
- if WACC = 9%, then IRR = 8.79% REJECTED
- if WACC = 8%, then IRR = 8.54% ACCEPTED
In order for this project to be profitable, the WACC would need to be very low (around 8% or less).
Explanation:
cost of opening a new mine $120 million
annual cash flow $20 million
expected cleaning costs $2 per year in perpetuity
the cost of keeping the site clean forever = $2 million / discount rate or WACC:
- if WACC = 12%, then perpetual cost = $16.67 million
- if WACC = 10%, then perpetual cost = $20 million
- if WACC = 9%, then perpetual cost = $22.22 million
- if WACC = 8%, then perpetual cost = $25 million
The effect of the transaction by Atkins Company of collecting payment for an amount owed by a customer is One asset would increase $1,750 and a different asset would decrease $1,750, causing no effect.
<h3>How does an increase and decrease in assets affect the accounting equation?</h3>
The fact that a customer owed Atkins Company means that the customer was an accounts receivable which is an asset account.
The cash that Atkins Company collected is also an asset. So, the transaction simply led to one asset(accounts receivable) being reduced and the other asset(cash) being increased. The amount is the same so there would be no effect.
Find out more on changes to the accounting equation at brainly.com/question/27905497
#SPJ1
Answer:
b its b because it says he works hard and he is willing to get a good salary
