Answer:
In the early sixteenth century, Iran was united under the rule of the Safavid dynasty (1501–1722), the greatest dynasty to emerge from Iran in the Islamic period. The Safavids descended from a long line of Sufi shaikhs who maintained their headquarters at Ardabil, in northwestern Iran. In their rise to power, they were supported by Turkmen tribesmen known as the Qizilbash, or red heads, on account of their distinctive red caps. By 1501, Isma‘il Safavi and his Qizilbash warriors wrested control of Azerbaijan from the Aq Quyunlu, and in the same year Isma‘il was crowned in Tabriz as the first Safavid shah (r. 1501–24). Upon his accession, Shi‘a Islam became the official religion of the new Safavid state, which as yet consisted only of Azerbaijan. But within ten years, all of Iran was brought under Safavid dominion. However, throughout the sixteenth century, two powerful neighbors, the Shaibanids to the east and the Ottomans to the west (both orthodox Sunni states), threatened the Safavid empire.
Explanation:
Answer:
"King Alcohol"
Explanation:
I'm not completely positive, but if you read the title of the article is sounds like it is written about this certain "King Alcohol"...
Answer:
my joints worked together and my leg muscles helped me from falling over. when you sit or stand you use the muscles in your legs to push up off the chair or to sit back down
Minimum sentencing laws affected <u>African Americans</u> disproportionately because powder cocaine was often consumed by <u>White people.</u>
<h3>How were minimal sentencing laws unfair?</h3>
Mandatory minimum sentencing laws led to a lot of African Americans being thrown into prison.
This wasn't fair because White people consumed powder cocaine more and yet were not arrested as often.
Find out more on minimum sentencing laws at brainly.com/question/27234871
#SPJ1
