1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tatiyna
3 years ago
14

This is serious, no joke. pls pls tell me if you know someone named Domingo Briseno, have you seen on here lately. I really need

to know
Business
1 answer:
hram777 [196]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

please tell the question properly

Explanation:

You might be interested in
If the government decides to adopt a carbon tax, the price of goods whose production generates carbon emissions will __________
Lunna [17]

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "C": increase; remain unchanged.

Explanation:

Externalities are the effect by which third parties are affected by the actions of others even if the third party does not have to do with operation s of the entity causing the harm. The typical example of an externality is related to companies' pollution. Governments are more than likely to impose taxes on such organizations. Not to affect their profits and to keep their production at the same level, those companies raise the price of their products affecting the consumer eventually.  

Then, <em>imposing levies on carbon will rise the price of carbon goods keeping the quantity produced at the same rate.</em>

3 0
3 years ago
Elise Corporation has the following sales mix for its three products: A, 20%; B, 35%; and C, 45%. Fixed costs total $400,000 and
Aneli [31]

Answer:

800 units of product A must be sold for break-even

Explanation:

Given, weighted-average contribution is $100.

Total break-even units = Total fixed cost  / Weighted-average contribution

Total break-even units = $400,000  / $100

Total break-even units = 4,000 units

Product A break-even = 4,000 x 20%

Product A break-even = (800 units)

Hence, the correct answer is 800 units.

6 0
3 years ago
Retain the small predictable layers of risk and transfer the unpredictable catastrophic layer of risk. Does this statement promo
ELEN [110]

Answer:

Yes the statement does

Explanation:

Retaining small predictable layers of risk and transferring the unpredictable catastrophic layer of risk to a more capable body is a very good approach towards  promoting appropriate risk financing decision making, this is because

Financial risk decisions are decisions taken between alternatives i.e risks associated with business activities . it is more appropriate to take alternatives with a predictable layer of risk,that way it would be easier for the management to handle the risk associated with it, while transferring the unpredictable catastrophic layer of risk to a more capable body ,like the Insurance companies .

7 0
3 years ago
Presented below are two independent situations: A) Sandhill Inc. acquired 10% of the 420,000 shares of common stock of Schuberge
Vilka [71]

Answer:

The journal entries for both corporations is prepared below

A)

Date: June 17

Accounts title and Explanations: Stock investment, dr. (420,000*$15*10%) 630,000

Accounts title and Explanations: Cash, Cr. 630,000

____________________________

Date: Sept 3.

Accounts title and Explanations: Cash, dr. (120,000*10%) 12,000

Accounts title and Explanations: Dividend revenue, Cr. 12,000

______________________________

Date: Dec 31.

Accounts title and Explanations: Stock investments, dr. (520,000*10%) 52,000

Accounts title and Explanations: Investment revenue, Cr. 52,000

____________________________

B)

Date: Jan 1

Accounts title and Explanations: Stock investment, dr. (120,000*$18*30%) 648,000

Accounts title and Explanations: Cash, Cr. 648,000

____________________________

Date: May 15

Accounts title and Explanations: Cash, dr. (120,000*30%) 36,000

Accounts title and Explanations: Dividend revenue, Cr. 36,000

______________________________

Date: Dec 31.

Accounts title and Explanations: Stock investments, dr. (220,000*30%) 66,000

Accounts title and Explanations: Investment revenue, Cr. 66,000

____________________________

7 0
3 years ago
You own a portfolio of two stocks, a and
Furkat [3]
Stock a is $2000. Calculate 10.5% of $2000, which equals $210.
Stock b is $3000. Calculate 14.7% of $3000, which is $441.

The expected return on the portfolio is $210 + $441, which equals $651. 
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is it called when you take part of someone's paycheck for yourself? (aka stealing their money)
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about the price elasticity of demand is correct The absolute value of the elasticity of demand
    13·1 answer
  • Sam buys 100 shares of Acme stock at $100 per share on January 1, Year 1. At the end of the first year (December 31, Year 1), sh
    12·1 answer
  • Waterway Industries signed a three-month, zero-interest-bearing note on November 1, 2020 for the purchase of $499900 of inventor
    13·1 answer
  • A client invests in an equity indexed annuity that has a guaranteed rate of 3% annual return, a 10% cap and 80% participation. i
    6·1 answer
  • The Greek Connection had sales of $32 million in 2009, and a cost of goods sold of $20 million. A simplified balance sheet for t
    15·1 answer
  • What are the potential risks of having all three of these buckets (savings, investments and debt payments) belong in the same ca
    12·1 answer
  • Joshua is 25 years old and has a high risk job making $72,000 a year. The insurance company charges him an extra 20% on top of h
    10·1 answer
  • Reg has just purchased a new car. The car had a list price of $22,499, and he was responsible for 7. 96% sales tax, a $2,138 veh
    10·1 answer
  • Suppose you were writing a social media plan for Two Scoops, with two objectives: to improve brand awareness in new markets and
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!