A. <span>formal and impersonal</span>
Answer:
Summary Of Rethinking The Wild By Christopher Solomon Essay
1530 Words7 Pages
Humanity co-exists with nature in a relationship that periodically shifts between symbiotic and parasitic. We maintain this relationship in order to survive. In exchange, we carefully monitor how our behavior alters the natural environment and affects those living within it. This responsibility is the price we pay for our species’ sentience and dominance. To help fulfill our duty, America established the 1954 Wilderness Act in hopes of becoming passive “guardians” of nature instead of encroaching “gardeners.” However, the Wilderness Act has failed. In his article, “Rethinking the Wild”, Christopher Solomon questions the effectiveness of the law and correctly concludes that, after fifty years of dormancy, mankind must take an active role in environmental protection, the role of the gardener. Though critics may argue that the passivity of the “guardian” should be maintained, realistically, little can be done to preserve the environment when we refuse to do anything. Because mankind has a greater stake in the wilderness than we realize, we must assume a proactive role in protecting the wilderness out of respect for nature and our own ethical standards.
Boundaries and Investments
Assume for the sake of our argument that nature holds no intrinsic value. Why, then, is the wilderness worth protecting? Truthfully, the wilderness can be a valuable indicator of the planet’s overall health, which is not easily gauged in industrialized and populated areas due to human influence.
The answer that best completes the blank above is COMPOUND. A compound condition is established when multiple questions are asked before an outcome is determined. When a condition becomes compound, this means that there would be more possibilities for the questions being asked. The more the questions asked, the more the outcome becomes more complicated.
Answer: Humans only care about something being slaughtered if its "theirs." Or they see it as their own in any sort of way. We care less about the neighbor's pet being hit by a car that "our: pet being hit by a car. The same goes for children. "Their" child is being stolen, it makes the person feel sad, but mostly pity, for the 'owners' of that child. "My" child is being stolen, makes the person much more concerned about the situation BCS the child was "Thiers."
Explanation:
In "Song for the Turtles in the Gulf," the speaker refers to "secret importance" and "eyes of another intelligence" to discuss human ignorance.
<h3>What is the poem about?</h3>
The poem "Song for the Turtles in the Gulf," by Linda Hogan, shows the speaker's respect for nature. The speaker, most likely Hogan herself, knows to appreciate the beauty, majesty, power and intelligence of nature. One of her teachers, so to speak, was a turtle with which she swam in the ocean. Now, however, that turtle is dead due to an oil spill.
Hogan then refers to the turtle's "secret importance" and their "eyes of another intelligence" in order to talk about human ignorance. The man who picks up the turtle's dead body and the men who cause the turtle's death are incapable of understanding the importance of that turtle. They do not see nature's beauty and majesty like the speaker does. They do not respect life.
With the information above in mind, we can conclude that the answer provided is correct.
Learn more about "Song for the Turtles in the Gulf" here:
brainly.com/question/23129292
#SPJ1
