Answer:
option (a) is correct.
Explanation:
Economic profits refers to the profits which comes out after deducting the implicit costs and explicit costs from the total revenue.
Whereas the accounting profits takes into the effect of explicit costs only.
Implicit cost refers to the loss of money income by choosing some other alternative. It is also known as the opportunity cost.
Explicit costs refers to the costs that are incurred for operating or running a business.
Accounting profit = Total revenue - Explicit costs
Economic profit = Total revenue - Explicit costs - Implicit costs
Therefore, if the implicit costs are greater than zero then the economic profits is less than the accounting profits.
Answer:
$160
Explanation:
her net monthly take home pay will be reduced by $200 x (1 - combined tax rate = $200 x (1 - 20%) = $200 x 0.8 = $160
If instead of contributing to her 401k account, Betty took the money home, she would have to pay $40 in taxes (both state and federal), so the net amount that she receives is reduced by the taxes that she pays.
Answer: performance feedback
Explanation: Feedback on performance is a process of communication. It should be continuous as improvements are made on the basis of information exchanged between the manager and the subordinates. Regular follow-up dialogue should be in place to determine success.
Feedback is structured to see where things go right and where they go wrong. This suggests that leaders may need to be vigilant while they develop new behaviors and conquer the learning curves of new skills.
Answer:
d. $5,000
Explanation:
Patnode's information is missing, so I looked it up. I found the balance sheet for 2014 and 2015. Hope that it is the same question:
total depreciation expense for 2015 = change in accumulated depreciation (2015 - 2014) + change in accumulated amortization (2015 - 2014) = ($3,000 - $0) + ($3,000 - $1,000) = $3,000 + $2,000 = $5,000
Answer:
First we need to first find the equilibrium quantity and price during normal times.
The equilibrium price in normal times is P=$3 and the equilibrium quantity is 55 bottles.
During the hurricane, the government will set a price ceiling of $3. We can infer from the table that the quantity supplied at P=$3 is 55 bottles while the quantity demanded during hurricane at the price of $3 per bottle is 105 bottles. Hence,
105-55= 50
During a hurricane, there would be a shortage of 50 bottles of water.
If there were no price ceiling, then the equilibrium price would be such that the quantity demanded during hurricane equals the quantity supplied. From the table we can see that the equilibrium price would in that case be P=$5 per bottle where the equilibrium quantity is 85 bottles. With the price ceiling only 55 bottles are available for trading. Now without the price ceiling 85 bottles are available.
Hence consumers would have to pay an additional $2 (=5-3) but they can now buy an additional 30 bottles [=85-55].
Without the antiprice gouging law, consumers would have to pay $2 more than the ceiling price, but they would bv able to buy 30 more bottles of water.
