I would say A, and I think you mentioned Independence, but if you didn't then it is D
<u> D. Men are only human and fallible themselves and cannot claim their opinions to be divine and infallible.</u>
The excerpt asserts rulers' nature (both civilian and ecclesiastical): they are fallible, imperfect, and uninspired men. Still, over the centuries, they have established and imposed their opinions on others as reliable, as the only truth. But this is wrong, the divine, and the truth can not depend on men's opinions or beliefs about what they think it's right. In conclusion, men with their fallible and imperfect nature, cannot claim their opinions to be divine and infallible.
Answer:
Boyle provides enough information to trace the sequence of events (logos), which allows you to understand how untrustworthy the narrator truly is (ethos) and to feel the terrible impact his careless and irresponsible actions had on the people of Borneo (pathos).
Explanation:
Teachers are smart, so change some words to avoid plagiarism. :)
It is feautrured in Songs of Experience because the poem talks about the experience of a tiger. It is a suspense poem. Indeed, the life of a tiger is full of suspenses. The poem's opening lines are:
Tyger Tyger, burning bright,
In the forests of the night;
What immortal hand or eye,
Could frame thy fearful symmetry?
The poet praises the the qualities of the tiger by asking questions without answering them. In the remaining lines of the poem, the author continues praising the perfectness of the animal, calling it dark craftsmanship. The thought-provoking point is about the comparison between The Tyger and the previous poem The Lamb which the poet himself doubts that the same God could create innocent spirit like a lamb and such a fierce animal like tiger at the same time. or it could be interpreted as God's different expressions showing his kindness in the face of lamb and his anger in the qualities of tiger.
